Laserfiche WebLink
n~xrro~r.~s <br />City Council <br />Auc~ust ?..3, _l9£39 <br />to orc~anizecl collection for residen~ial hauling, The City <br />9.s goi.ng to organiced collection effectS.ve September lst. <br />On that basi.s, the City will not be li.censing any additional <br />resiclentS.al hau7.ers. <br />Cot~~s sta~ecl that his proposal as for commerci77. h<~ulinc~. <br />fllesener reported ~hat it is the Caty's intenta.on th~t once <br />the consorti.um is in place, ~he moratorium will be lifted on <br />commercial hauler'> li,censes. <br />The City Attorney reported that current7.y t•letro Re:~use is <br />picking up trash in the City without a license. Tl~e <br />nttorney also re~orted that Poor Ri.chard's J.ost 9ts lacense <br />to operate within Ramsey County. The Attorney stated that <br />tYie sale of accoun~s irom Poor Richard's to Pletro Refuse is <br />of no concern to the City, ancl the Attorney again sta~ed <br />that P~letro Refuse has no license to operate s•~ithin the City, <br />I~lesener suggested that the Cif.y c3etennine whether or. not <br />D~e~ro P.efuse has acquired Poor Richard's accounts. L;lesener <br />stated that in his review o:E the Couni:y's resolution it <br />appears that anyone purchasinc~ Poor Richarc3's business would <br />not be licensed Sn the County. <br />Pahey f.elt the request to license kietro Refuse shoulc~ be <br />denied zt this tirne until the consortium is up znc~ running <br />and the necessary contract signed. <br />Collova s~ated that once organized collection goes into <br />effect for residential, it is the go11 of the City to 1_ooY, <br />at trash collection for everythirig above R-2 to get multiple <br />housing and apartments recycling, <br />Gottas reportecl that P9etro k.efuse is licensed by ~he County <br />and again stated that P~ietro Refuse is not a part oL Poor <br />Richard's. C~7etro Refuse has 7 to 7.0 accounts witkai.n the <br />City, and s,~ould like to be 19.censed so they can continue to <br />provide service to these accounts. <br />Sczlze suggested that t]etro Refuse submit a copy of tkaeir <br />].a.cense £rom the County. <br />E'ahey suggested that the City Attozney revi.ew the si~uation <br />~nd confirm the licensinc~ of T9etro Refuse by the County. <br />Collova suggested that after Septernber lst C~letro Refuse <br />subrnit the ap~ro~riate ~~~lication. <br />Fahey agreed and suggested that the matter be ~J.ace~l on ~kie <br />September 13th ac~enc]a. <br />The City 1lttorrzey statec3 that the informati.on he has is that <br />Door Rich~rd's sold to A?etro ReTuse ancl Poor Richard's is <br />claiming that their license as transf~rrable. 'C'he Ci.ty <br />Attorney suggestecl tha~ the Council. take no action on the <br />P~ge 7..5 <br />