Laserfiche WebLink
b4.T. t7U~1.' F; `; <br />City Cotirzcil <br />Au<:;ust 7..3, 19~9 <br />and the Park Commission is ~~roposinc~ a 7.~90 bude~et item of_ <br />55,200 from the City tocaards this ec~ui.pment. <br />Scalze reported that the North Suburban Youth [lssoc9~tion <br />has clenied a rec~uest for a 520,000 clonation toward bacicstop <br />fencing in Pioneer Parlc indicating their. feeling cnat tPiis <br />s~~ould be too much money in the sarne area in the same year.. <br />The City can present the same request in 19~0. <br />Scalze sugc~ested that the P-~Iayor send a letter to the DlortYa <br />Suburban Youth Association explaining that the LCR71 is <br />really an unbre'lla orc~anization G~~hich represents a].ot of <br />cli.fferent groups and covers 1~ different sports, Scalze <br />explainec~ that the Association is of ~k7e impression th~t ~k~e <br />requests being pre~ented to them by the I~CRn represent on.l.y <br />one c~rou~. Scalze pointed out that if the City were .larger, <br />~here would probab]y be J,9: di£ferent groups in existence <br />representing each spozt, rather than tYae umbrella s~ystem <br />which is no~a irz place. Scalze fe1~ thaf such an ex~~lanation <br />~aould hel~ the Ci'cy in futur.e funding recluests. <br />C,1II.~PIIGI~~ `C'he Council di.scussed the City°s mileage reimbursement r~ite <br />RrTP9SUPSFMEN'1' and a.t ~•ras poi.nted out that tl~e City's ordinance establishes <br />RATP, the rate at 2.5 cents A~er mile. It was the concensus of t17e <br />Council that the rate shoulcl remain at 2.5 cents per mile. <br />CIII.~PL3PCI: £~hey r.eported th~t the Cit~y has received a letter. F..rom <br />SOCInL Agnes Chlebeclc indicating that Joe Chlebeck is totally <br />SFCUP.T.TY clisabled. There is also a letter ~rom PIr.. Chlebeclc°s cloctor <br />REI[~~,UI:SEDIFNT confarming this. <br />Fahey reported that Mrs. Chlebeck has been researching <br />social security benefits for P<Ir. Chlebeck and it ap~ears <br />that there saas an overpayment to social security b~t~veen the <br />years 1973 and 7.975 ~-~taich was refunded to ~he City, hov~ever, <br />the City never refunded PIr. Ch7.ebeck his sharee Tkxe amount <br />whach shoulcl have been refunclec~ is bettaeen 52,~00 ancl <br />52,500. <br />Pahey requested that additional resear_cYz be done i.nto this <br />matter, and if deterrninecl ap~ropriate, the refuncl b~ m~ae to <br />[9r, Chlebeclt. <br />T~1r. I37.esener introducecl the io].los~~inc~ resolu~ion and rnovect <br />its ado~tion: <br />£:F3SOLU'I'ION NO. II9-f3-~21 ° AUTI.IOI:T.ZID'fG TI1P [4AYOIt <br />TO T40I2K i~7ITI3 TIIE CI'I'Y At7DSTOR AND DPPi1TY CLFRI: <br />'1'O DETEPPZINE IP A SOC]:X1I, SPCURITY R~SiiBURSFAIF'N'i' <br />b+7~1; A1~lDF TO T'IR. C:IT~PLt~CK, AND IF' NOT, 7~PPAOVING <br />SUCII REIMT3URSFMENT IP1 2'IIE F1MOiJNT OI.~ $3,39A,36 <br />PIISICH SNCI,UD}.3S INTFs'REST <br />Page 33 <br />