My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-08-2025 Workshop Packet
>
City Council Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2025
>
01-08-2025 Workshop Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/9/2025 12:49:39 PM
Creation date
2/27/2025 12:39:55 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
92
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
TP-5 HIGHWAY AND BRIDGE TURN BACKS & FUNDING <br />TP-6 “3C” TRANSPORTATION PLANNING PROCESS: ELECTED <br />OFFICIALS’ ROLE <br />Funding sources for local transportation projects are limited to the use of Municipal State <br />Aid Street Program (MSAS), Transportation Advancement Account (TAA) distributions, <br />property taxes and special assessments. With increasing pressures on city budgets and <br />limited tools and resources, cities are finding it increasingly difficult to maintain aging <br />streets. <br />Street improvement districts allow cities in developed and developing areas to fund new <br />construction as well as reconstruction and maintenance efforts. <br />The street improvement district is designed to allow cities, through a fair and objective <br />fee structure, to create a district or districts within the city in which fees are raised on <br />properties in the district and spent within the boundaries of the district. <br />Metro Cities supports the authority of local units of government to establish street <br />improvement districts. Metro Cities also supports changes to special assessment laws <br />to make assessing state-owned property a more predictable process with uniformity in <br />the payment of assessments across the state. <br />Cities do not have the financial capacity and in many cities the technical expertise other <br />than through significant property tax increases, to absorb additional roadway or bridge <br />infrastructure responsibilities without new funding sources. The existing municipal <br />turnback fund is not adequate based on contemplated turn backs. <br />Metro Cities supports jurisdictional reassignment or turnback of roads (Minn. Stat. § <br />161.16, subd. 4) on a phased basis using functional classifications and other appropriate <br />criteria subject to a corresponding mechanism for adequate funding of roadway <br />improvements and continued maintenance. <br />Metro Cities does not support a wholesale turnback of county or state roads or bridges <br />without the consent of the municipality and the total cost, agreed to by the municipality, <br />being reimbursed to the city in a timely manner. The process for establishing state <br />policies to assign a shared cost participation for newly constructed or rebuilt bridges over <br />trunk highways to local officials, must include input by the local municipalities affected, <br />and any assigned shared costs and responsibilities must be agreed to by the <br />municipalities. <br />The Transportation Advisory Board (TAB) was developed to meet federal requirements, <br />designating the Metropolitan Council as the organization that is responsible for a <br />continuous, <br />TP-4 STREET IMPROVEMENT DISTRICTS <br />33
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.