My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-08-2025 Workshop Packet
>
City Council Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2025
>
01-08-2025 Workshop Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/9/2025 12:49:39 PM
Creation date
2/27/2025 12:39:55 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
92
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
HED-10 HOUSING ORDINANCE ENFORCEMENT <br />•Improving the ability of cities to recoup the increased public safety, management, <br />and enforcement costs related to vacant properties; <br />•Improvement of the redemption process to provide increased notification to renters, <br />strengthen the ability of homeowners to retain their properties, and reduce the <br />amount of time a property is vacant; <br />•Expedition of the tax forfeiture process; <br />•Increasing financial tools for neighborhood recovery efforts, including tax increment <br />financing; and <br />•Year-round notification by utility companies of properties not receiving utility service. <br />A Minnesota State Supreme Court ruling, Morris v. Sax, stated that provisions of the <br />city of Morris’ rental housing code were invalid because there were subjects dealt with <br />under the state building code and the city was attempting to regulate these areas <br />“differently from the state building code.” <br />Minn. Stat. § 326B.121, subdivision 1 states: “The State Building Code is the standard <br />that applies statewide for the construction, reconstruction, alteration, repair, and use of <br />buildings and other structures of the type governed by the code. The State Building <br />Code supersedes the building code of any municipality.” Subdivision 2 states: “A <br />municipality must not by ordinance, or through development agreement, require <br />building code provisions regulating components or systems of any structure that are <br />different from any provision of the State Building Code. This subdivision does not <br />prohibit a municipality from enacting or enforcing an ordinance requiring existing <br />components or systems of any structure to be maintained in a safe and sanitary <br />condition or in good repair, but not exceeding the standards under which the structure <br />was built, reconstructed, or altered, or the component or system was installed, unless <br />specific retroactive provisions for existing buildings have been adopted as part of the <br />State Building Code. A municipality may, with the approval of the state building official, <br />adopt an ordinance that is more restrictive than the State Building Code where <br />geological conditions warrant a more restrictive ordinance. A municipality may appeal <br />the disapproval of a more restrictive ordinance to the commissioner.” <br />Metro Cities supports the ability of cities to enforce all housing codes passed by a local <br />municipality to maintain its housing stock. <br />49
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.