My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-28-90 Council Minutes
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1990
>
11-28-90 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/3/2009 3:05:26 PM
Creation date
7/31/2009 2:53:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />NOVEMBER 28, 1990 <br />Mr. Fahey introduced the following resolution and moved <br />its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION NO. 90-11-523 - REAFFIRMING APPROVAL OF THE <br />PRELIMINARY PLAT OF COSTA ESTATES WITH COSTA LANE <br />RUNNING NORTH TO ALLEN AVENUE AND INSTRUCTING THE CITY <br />ATTORNEY AND CITY ADMINISTRATOR TO DRAW UP THE <br />APPROPRIATE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT STATING THAT THE CITY <br />WILL INITIATE CONDEMNATION ACTION TO EFFECTUATE COSTA <br />LANE GOING TO THE NORTH AT SUCH TIME AS THE DEVELOPER <br />REQUESTS THE ROAD BE CONSTRUCTED WITH COSTS OF <br />CONDEMNATION TO BE ASSESSED EQUALLY AGAINST ALL THE <br />BENEFITTING LOTS ABUTTING COSTA LANE AND WITH THE <br />FURTHER UNDERSTANDING THAT SHOULD THE COST OF <br />ASSESSMENTS EXCEED BENEFITS RECEIVED, THE DEVELOPERS <br />AGREE TO ACCEPT THE ASSESSMENT AMOUNT OVER BENEFIT AND <br />WAIVE THEIR RIGHT TO APPEAL AS A CONDITION OF ROADWAY <br />IMPROVEMENT <br />The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by LaValle. <br />Ayes (3) Fahey, LaValle, Collova, Blesener. <br />Nays (1) Blesener. <br />Resolution declared adopted. <br />Blesener stated that he opposes the resolution since he <br />believes the Plessel house would be too close to the <br />road. <br />KRIENKE Fahey opened the public hearing to consider the request <br />LOT SPLIT & of Dr. Krienke to divide his property at 89 West County <br />VARIANCE Road C into two lots. It was pointed out that a <br />variance is also necessary for lot area and lot width, <br />since the property is a corner lot and due to the <br />City's previous policy of requiring depths of 135 feet <br />for the lots along Rosewood Drive. It was pointed out <br />that both the Planning Commission and City Planner have <br />recommended approval of the lot split and variance. <br />There was no one from the general public present <br />wishing to comment on this matter. <br />Upon motion by Fahey, seconded by Blesener, the public <br />hearing was closed. <br />Blesener pointed out that the resulting lot would only <br />have about a 30 foot building pad for a house. <br />Blesener stated that there may be a future variance <br />request for sideyard setback as a result. <br />Mr. Blesener introduced <br />moved its adoption: <br />Page <br />the following resolution and <br />8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.