My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-12-90 Council Minutes
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1990
>
12-12-90 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/3/2009 3:05:46 PM
Creation date
7/31/2009 2:53:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />DECEMBER 12, 1990 <br />those cities with little commercial development felt <br />the old formula was unfair. The old formula spread <br />costs based on 1/3 events, 1/3 area, and 1/3 <br />population. <br />Fahey reported on studies that were conducted which <br />showed the the Ramsey County Sheriff's Department was <br />still the most economical way to provide police <br />protection for the City. Fahey also reported that the <br />City has been working with the Sheriff's Department to <br />change some policies and procedures to keep costs down. <br />Bob DeBace asked if the City received a share of fines <br />from prosecutions. <br />It was pointed out that the City has budgeted $35,000 <br />in revenue under Fines & Forfeitures for 1991. <br />A resident asked about the City's #1 tax status as <br />reported this past summer in the newspaper. <br />Scalze replied that this status was reported by the <br />Citizens League. However, the facts are that the City <br />of Little Canada ranks 46 out of 98 as far as the <br />City's tax levy, while the School District ranked #2 <br />and the County was in the middle. The combination of <br />these three taxing authorities resulted in the #1 <br />status. <br />Fahey pointed out that in the early 1960's and 1970's <br />when the City was developing its sanitary sewer and <br />water systems, the City choose to sell bonds for these <br />improvements, rather than assess the improvements as <br />many other cities have done. Therefore, while the cost <br />of these improvements shows up in property taxes, the <br />cost of similar improvements in other cities show up on <br />property tax statements as special assessments. The <br />Citizens League took into account only property taxes <br />in their study and not special assessments. Therefore, <br />the study is misleading. Fahey reported that every <br />year the City has made efforts to reduce indebtedness <br />and refinanced bonds where possible to improve the <br />financial condition of the City. <br />The City Administrator pointed out that the City of <br />Roseville, for example, has substantial tax base over <br />which to spread their levies. Also, the Citizens <br />League study factors in the equalization rate of each <br />jurisdiction. The State requires the average valuation <br />of all properties to be at a minimum of 90% of market <br />value based on actual sales data. Ramsey County is at <br />about 95%, while other counties in the State are at <br />less than 90% This factor effects the results of the <br />study, when estimated taxes on an $80,000 house were <br />calculated. The equalization rate in effect was used as <br />a discount. Taxes are not calculated in this manner. <br />Page 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.