Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />March 13, 1991 <br />EXTENSION Council reviewed the request of Gordie Howe for an <br />FOR FILING extention for filing the final plat for <br />FINAL PLAT Frederickshaven. <br />FREDERICKS- <br />HAVEN Mr. Blesener introduced the following resolution and <br />moved its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION NO. 91-3-91 - APPROVING A 100-DAY EXTENSION <br />FOR TxE FILING OF THE FINAL PLAT FOR FREDERICKSHAVEN AS <br />REQUESTED BY GORDIE HOWE <br />The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Collova. <br />Ayes (5) Blesener, Collova, Scalze, LaValle, Hanson. <br />Nays (O). <br />Resolution declared adopted. <br />LIQUOR The City Attorney reviewed the points raised by Steve <br />ORDINANCE Morelan in his letter dated February 19th regarding the <br />proposed Liquor Ordinance. Under Section 701.010 (j), <br />the City Attorney did not believe there was a problem, <br />and pointed out that that section refers to the <br />premises occupied by the licensee for an event. The <br />ordinance does not require the premises to be owned or <br />permanently occupied by the licensee. <br />Section 702.040 (3) refers to a S40 temporary license <br />fee. The Administrator reported that in the past the <br />City has waived this fee for temporary liquor licenses. <br />Scalze suggested that the fee could remain in the <br />Ordinance, however, leaving the Council the option of <br />waiving the fee as part of its approval of the license. <br />The City Attorney reported that Section 702.060 (7) <br />contains a typographical error which was corrected. <br />Section 702.070 (7) requires a permit from the State <br />Department of Public Safety for the sale of set-ups. <br />The Attorney pointed out that the non-intoxicating <br />liquor license does not allow for the sale of set-ups, <br />therefore, either an intoxicating license or <br />consumption and display license is needed in order to <br />sell set-ups. <br />The Administrator pointed out that the State charges <br />$151.50 for a consumption and display license. An <br />intoxicating liquor license is subject to City fees, <br />therefore, may be a better alternative and would <br />provide the City with more control regarding fees and <br />application requirements. <br />Next reviewed were concerns raised with Sections <br />702.070 (9) and (10) and 703.100 (8) with the Attorney <br />suggesting that language excepting premises covered by <br />temporary licenses could be added. Council agreed. <br />Page 3 <br />