My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-17-91 Council Workshop Minutes
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1991
>
10-17-91 Council Workshop Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/3/2009 3:10:48 PM
Creation date
7/31/2009 2:54:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />OCTOBER 17, 1991 <br />*The 12/1/94 and 12/1/95 maturities of the G.O. <br />Improvement Bonds of 1963 will be called on 12/1/91. <br />*The 1/1/96 maturity of the G.O. Refunding Bonds of <br />1985 will be called on 1/1/91. <br />*Tax levies of 1983 and 1985 bonds will be further <br />adjusted in collection years 1992 and 1993 based on <br />the call of later maturing principal. <br />*The G.O. Storm Sewer Bonds of 1986 will be advance <br />refunded for savings as well as for restructuring <br />considerations. <br />The City Administrator pointed out that the bond <br />coupons that would be called are at rates ranging from <br />8.20% to 8.70%. Lower current interest yields are part <br />of the rational for calling in these coupons. The <br />Administrator also pointed out that the 1986 Storm <br />Sewer bond issue is structured so that primarily <br />interest is being paid in the initial years, with very <br />little reduction of actual debt. By the refunding <br />proposed, principal will be paid earlier and at a lower <br />rate, thereby reducinq tax levies needed to retire the <br />debt. <br />Blesener pointed out the City's aging infrastructure <br />system, and suggested that the cash-on-hand in some of <br />these bond issues gives the City a reserve fund for <br />future infrastructure replacement. Blesener suggested <br />that this is an issue that should be discussed at the <br />upcoming goal-settinq session. <br />The City Administrator pointed out that he began <br />discussions with Springsted about debt restructuring <br />about a year ago. However, at that time the financial <br />climate was such that a restructuring would not have <br />been beneficial to the City. The Administrator <br />outlined the goals that he felt would be met by a <br />restructuring at this time. Those are: <br />*Reduction and stabilization of future tax levies; <br />*Retention of cash balances for future infrastructure <br />replacement; <br />*Clean-up of the storm sewer bond to push debt forward <br />while making better use of the City's money. <br />Page 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.