Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />APRIL 19, 1993 <br />The Administrator reported that in 1986, the City <br />assessed reconstruction projects at $35.81 per front <br />foot. Factoring in the CPI adjustments since 1986, <br />that figure comes to approximately $46.00. The <br />Administrator also felt that the $44.10 figure was <br />supportable using the information provided by the <br />City's appraiser. Therefore, the Administrator felt <br />that the 90/10 ratio seemed to fit. <br />Morelan pointed out that the Council has decided on a <br />30 foot width for Vanderbie. <br />The Administrator agreed, and pointed out that Al1en <br />Avenue has been recommended at a 32 foot width by the <br />Council. <br />Scalze felt that Al1en Avenue needed to be only 30 feet <br />wide, and if the extra 2 feet in width was necessary <br />due to access to the Pioneer Park, the City should pick <br />up the cost of that extra 2 feet. <br />Hanson pointed out the possibility of Al1en Avenue on <br />the east tying in with other streets further east. <br />The City Administrator felt that the difference with <br />the two sections of Allen Avenue, is that on the <br />western section there is more likelihood of on-street <br />parking given the setbacks of the existing homes, <br />therefore, 32 feet was preferable. <br />Scalze stated that it was her understanding that Allen <br />Avenue would have the extra width because of its use <br />for access to Pioneer Park. Therefore, the City should <br />pick up the cost of the extra 2 feet. <br />Morelan pointed out that the same argument could be <br />made for Eli Road. <br />The City Administrator felt that perhaps there was a <br />need for a standard assessment of no more than 30 feet <br />in width for a residential street. <br />Morelan agreed, and indicated that the standard <br />assessment on a residential street should be for no <br />more than an 8"/3" section and no more than 30 feet in <br />width. <br />Pedersen pointed out the increased cost to the City, <br />and asked if the City had the resources to bear these <br />costs. <br />The City Administrator felt that the City should assess <br />the maximum it could against benefitting properties, <br />Page 4 <br />