Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />MARCH 8, 1995 <br />rates be based on either a flat rate or family size. <br />Morelan pointed out the table on page 76 of the agenda. <br />He noted that only four of the cities shown on the <br />table charged for sewer based on water usage. The rest <br />charged residential sewer on a flat rate basis. <br />Pedersen asked how the City was charged for sewer. <br />The Administrator reported that sewer is metered, and <br />the City is charged accordingly. <br />Morelan also noted that based on the table on page 76, <br />the City has higher residential sewer rates than the <br />average of the 10 to 12 cities shown. The City is <br />considerably lower in its commercial rates, however. <br />Therefore, in order to equalize rates, it seems that <br />commercial rates should be increased. <br />Fahey asked if rates were a pass-through charge or if <br />personnel costs were included. <br />The City Administrator replied that rates are <br />determined by a combination of expenses based on <br />personnel costs and operating system expenses, but the <br />major portion of the rate is the pass-through cost from <br />the MCWWSD. <br />Fahey asked why the City's rates were so different from <br />those of other cities. <br />The Administrator replied that many times differences <br />can be explained by accounting issues involving what <br />expenses are charged against the funds, what is being <br />written off, depreciation, etc. <br />Morelan pointed out that depreciation is a biq portion <br />of the City's expense. Morelan pointed out that on <br />page 76, the City's residential rates mirror the <br />average while commercial rates are under the average. <br />Morelan felt that based on that information, a <br />commercial rate increase was warranted. <br />The Administrator pointed out that under the current <br />system a residential home with high water usage is <br />paying the same sewer costs as a low-volume water user. <br />Multiples are currently paying 70% of the residential <br />rate. There may be some logic to this since it is <br />10 <br />