Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />FEBRUARY 14, 1996 <br />Morelan agreed the discussion took place two years ago, <br />and that Dominium answered his questions vaguely saying <br />they would look into sprinkling the building. <br />The City Administrator reported that he raised issue <br />with Dominium Group a couple of weeks ago. The . <br />Administrator pointed out tabling action on the tax <br />exempt bonds may delay Dominium's closing. <br />Fahey stated he would be willing to call a special <br />meeting to act on the financing when Dominium is <br />prepared to respond to the Council's questions. <br />Pedersen suggested Dominium's response will be that the <br />retro-fitting will cost too much money. Pedersen asked <br />if the Council will then be prepared to take action on <br />the tax exempt bonds. <br />Morelan replied he would like to see the facts and <br />figures indicating that retro-fitting will cost too <br />much. <br />Fahey pointed out the City has the issuance fee which <br />can be used to defray the cost. <br />The Administrator felt it was appropriate to discuss <br />sprinkling the building, and pointed out the request <br />for approval of the tax exempt financing was presented <br />with little notice. At the time it was presented, the <br />Administrator indicated he raised the issue of <br />sprinkling the buildings. The potential insurance <br />savings was also pointed out to Dominium, as well as <br />the modified approach undertaken at Grand Pre'. <br />Scalze suggested Dominium also provide information on <br />what the CM fee will be used for. LaValle suggested <br />that Dominium copy the Council with any expenditures <br />the Trustee makes. <br />The Administrator pointed out for the benefit of the <br />general public that housing revenue bonds are not an <br />obligation of the City. The City would merely be <br />authorizing tax exempt status for the bonds. <br />Mr. LaValle introduced the following resolution and <br />moved its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION NO. 96-2-35 - TABLING ACTION ON A PROPOSAL <br />5 <br />