My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-14-2025 Council Packet
>
City Council Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2025
>
05-14-2025 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/22/2025 5:16:07 PM
Creation date
6/18/2025 9:52:33 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
131
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />A core consideration of this request relates to the time and standards in which the properties were <br />developed. 49 Old County Road C was constructed in 1984, and 50 County Road C East was <br />developed in 2004. The City has record of the zoning code that was in effect in 2004 as well as the <br />original permitting information for the home at 50 County Road C East. At the time, the City of Little <br />Canada had different zoning standards than it does today. The rear setback requirement for a principal <br />structure was only 30 feet (now 40) and there was no requirement for lot depth (now 130 feet). The <br />properties both appear to have been developed to code, with no variances or special approvals <br />required. Because of Code changes in 2021 that required a larger rear setback for R-1 properties, the <br />rear setback for the principal structure on both 50 County Road C East and 49 Old County Road C are <br />legally non-conforming, as neither meet nor exceed the 40-foot setback requirement. <br /> <br />REQUEST OF THE CITY <br />To shift the shared rear property line 8 feet to the south, the applicant needs to receive three approvals <br />from the City Council. <br /> <br />1. A Minor Subdivision approval which is the formal mechanism/review the City must complete <br />when an applicant seeks to adjust property lines or create 3 or fewer new lots. The applicant in <br />this case is not proposing to create any new lots but simply modify a property line for two <br />existing properties. <br /> <br />As a result of shifting the property line 8 feet, two variances are required for 49 Old County Road C <br />2. A variance to allow the rear setback from the home (principal structure) to be 30 feet when 40 <br />feet is required. <br /> <br />3. A variance to allow the lot depth to be 125.4 feet when 130 feet is required. <br /> <br />CODE CRITERIA <br />The applicant is requesting a minor subdivision boundary line adjustment and two variances. <br /> <br />What is a Minor Subdivision Boundary Line Adjustment? <br />A minor subdivision boundary line adjustment is the modification of one or more property lines. As a <br />result of a boundary line adjustment, one lot typically increases in size and the other decreases. <br />Subdivision is the division of land by platting, conveyance, registered land survey or other means into <br />two or more lots, plats, sites or other divisions, any of which is less than five acres in area. <br /> <br />The applicant has submitted all necessary paperwork for the minor subdivision boundary adjustment. <br /> <br />What is a Variance? <br />A variance is a formal exemption from the City’s zoning regulations. Because variances allow <br />exceptions to local laws adopted by ordinance, they must be evaluated with a high level of scrutiny. <br />To be granted a variance, an applicant must demonstrate that their request meets all of the criteria <br />established in City Code. The City Council must adopt specific findings of fact to support its decision <br />to approve or deny a variance request. <br /> <br />If the Council agrees with City Staff’s recommendation, it may adopt the findings of fact as presented <br />in the staff report. However, if the Council disagrees with the recommendation, it must provide <br />alternative findings of fact that address the criteria where its interpretation differs. <br /> <br />These findings of fact are critical because they establish the legal and policy basis for the decision. <br />They also serve as precedent for evaluating future variance requests and help inform Staff, applicants, <br />and future decision-makers about the intent behind each approval or denial. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.