My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-10-97 Council Minutes
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1997
>
06-10-97 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/3/2009 4:56:22 PM
Creation date
7/31/2009 2:58:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
NIINUT~S <br />CITY COUNCfL <br />J UN~ 10, 1997 <br />Frattalone reported that it would depend on the height and weight of the <br />buildin~. A l~rge buildin~ would require major soil corcecYions, and <br />Frattalone felt that existing soils would support 1,500 to 2,000 pounds per <br />square foot. Frattalone pointed out that lie has tried to market the property <br />as commercilL The parcel south of Allen Avenue is undesirlble as a <br />commercial piece given th~t it is only 300 Peet deep. The parcel to Che <br />north is 220 feet deep. i~rattalone also pointed out that Al(en Avenue <br />divides these two parcels, and there are existing utilities in the street. <br />Pahey asked if Allen Avenue were vacated and the two parcels combined, <br />if there would be enough depCh Por 1 high-qualiry ii~dustrial development. <br />Fr~ttalone stated tliat it would make a better parcel, l~owever, Yhere are still <br />tl~e soil problems to contend with. 11~1tt11one 1~1in reported on the fact <br />tl~at tl~e property h~s been for sale for several years. <br />Morelan questioned fhe effort that has been put into selling the property. <br />FratCalone replied Yh1t the property I~as been for' sale for at least l7 years, <br />alYhough his father has not had l~is for ssile th~t entire time. Fahey <br />commented that he l~as seen t~or sale signs on the property for many yea~s. <br />Morelan indicat~ed that individu~l parcels are useless, 1nd it would be the <br />entire area that wouid be of interest to 1 developer. <br />Frattalone agai~~ responded thlt tl~e pro~erty has been for sale for severa] <br />years, pointing out that~ Che B~itler property was Yor sale long before the <br />development ofPioneer Parl<. <br />Gordie Howe reported on discussion at the Pllnnin~ Commission meeting <br />that the twinhomes not be renYal units. I-[owe reported that tl~ey will <br />include a provision in the By-Laws restrictin~ Che twinhomes to owner- <br />occupied. <br />The Co~u~cil discussed the develo~~er's request to tower the park charge, <br />and Yhe consensus was to leave it at $625 }~er unit. Councii noted that they <br />spenY a lot of time in est~blisl~ing ti~e parl< charge, ~nd that while other <br />cities ~nay charge less, there 2re many eities that charge more. <br />Council also felt that access was needed from one or two of the cul-de- <br />sacs proposed in Pitrina P~rl< to Pioneer Parl<. "I'his issue along with the <br />restriction to owner-occupied I~ousing, lighting of ballfields, 1nd <br />construction traffic access should all be addressetl in the development <br />agreement. <br />6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.