Laserfiche WebLink
MiNUTGS <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />JULY 9, 1997 <br />needed to be vac~ted to remedy this situat~ion. However, it was <br />subsequently discovered th~t d~ie t~o an error in the init~ial legal descriptio~~, <br />the ~rocess must be repeated. <br />There was no one presei~P Prom the ~eneral p~iblic wishing t~o comment on <br />this matter. <br />Upon motion by Morelln, seconded by Sc11ze, the p~iblic hearing was <br />closed. <br />Mr. Morellu introduced the following resolution ~nd moved its adoption: <br />RESOL UT/ON N0. 97-7- I 60 - 1~i1 C'A %'/NG TRACT C A,S <br />RL'QUGS7'L'U l33',S'T. ./U/)E NIf:UICAL ,SU13.lGCT TO RETEN'!`ION <br />OF U77/.I%'I' EASEAIEN%:S ON BLi//~I1.1~ Ol~ IKG CITY <br />Tlte fore~oin~ resolution was tluly seconded by Sc<ilze. <br />Ayes (4) Morel~n, Sc21ze, Pedersen, Fahey. <br />Nays (0). Resolution decl~red ~tlopted. <br />STATUT~ Fahey reviewed the report submitted by City staff which intlicated thlt <br />130G ~n optioi~ avail~tble to the City in respooding t~o t~he requesC of'I'he Church <br />ofJes~~is Christ~ of lhe L,~tter Day S<iints to repeal St~~tute 1306 would be to <br />require the new addition to the Church bc sprinl<led upon construction and <br />ttllow a three lo live year period Pur the Church to sprinl<le the remainder <br />of the building. <br />ICen Archiblld, LDS, pointecl out t~hat the church h~s a Elat roof. <br />TherePore, Co sprinl<le the portion of the church not being renovated is both <br />imprlctical antl tlifficult Pi~es wo~ild be exposed and subject to <br />tampering by cl~ildren. Arcliibald ~felt a com~~romise sho~ild be lvai(able <br />for sm~ll additions. <br />Fahey felt the issue was not one ofcompromise, but rither wh~t the CiCy <br />could do to suppat public safeYy and encoura~e the instaliation of <br />s~xinl<ler systems. t~ahey intlicated [haf he did not su~~port the repeal oP <br />StaCute 1306. Short o'f repeal, the only option tl~e City discovered would <br />be to allow the installation ol' ~ sprinl<ler system ~mder a phasecl-in <br />approach. <br />Archibald pointed out that a ph~setl-in appro~ch cioesn't alleviate Yhe <br />difl~iculty in ~~uCtin~ in the sprinl<ler sysTem I~tter. Tl~e b~iiltling will still <br />have ~t low, tl~tt roof 1nd will be ditT'icult t~o sprinlde. Arcl~ib~tld pointed <br />out that the church could sprinl:le the additiou since the rooflines can be <br />