Laserfiche WebLink
o Estimated $200,000/unit for 106 total units <br />o $21,200,000 total taxable value <br />• Incremental value based on difference between existing and new land/building value <br />• Construction commences in 2026 and is completed in 2027 <br />o Project values 100% complete for assess 2028 and taxes payable 2029 <br />o Delay first increment until payable 2029 <br />• Net present value (discount) rate of 5.5% <br />• 2% annual market value inflation <br /> <br />Table 2a: Estimated Tax Increment Revenues based on 26 Years <br /> <br />Preliminary revenue projections based on maximum 26-year term <br /> <br /> Existing Base Land Value $264,100 <br /> Estimated Total Taxable Value $21,200,000 <br /> <br /> Estimated annual available increment (full buildout) $59,162 <br /> <br /> Total gross tax increment (26 years) $1,997,787 <br /> City retainage (10%) $199,777 <br /> Net amount available for development (90%) $1,798,010 <br /> <br /> Estimated Present Value Revenues (26 Years) at 5.5% $800,128 <br /> <br />Table 2b: Estimated Tax Increment Revenues based on reduced term of 15 Years <br /> <br />Preliminary revenue projections based on reduced term of district <br /> 15 Years 18 Years <br /> Existing Base Land Value $264,100 $264,100 <br /> Estimated Total Taxable Value $21,200,000 $21,200,000 <br /> <br /> Estimated annual available increment (full buildout) $59,162 $59,162 <br /> <br /> Total gross tax increment (26 years) $1,024,837 $1,269,357 <br /> City retainage (10%) $102,482 $126,934 <br /> Net amount available for development (90%) $922,355 $1,142,423 <br /> <br /> Estimated Present Value Revenues (26 Years) at 5.5% $543,619 $623,209 <br /> <br />The City has the option to consider providing tax increment to the project following receipt of the developer’s <br />request for tax increment assistance. There are also considerations as to the level and terms of assistance. As <br />discussed previously, the developer has included the maximum term of tax increment collections from a housing <br />district (up to 26 years) that results in the greatest level of TIF assistance. Alternatively, the City could offer a <br />reduced term of assistance (15 -18 years) that aligns with the term of the cash flow projections, or no assistance <br />at all, in which case the developer will be required to find alternate sources (including potential grant funding from <br />LCDA and other potential grant sources) to close the financing gap. The developer has also indicated local <br />support through TIF results in a stronger application for debt financing and tax credit equity that is necessary for <br />the project to proceed. Feasibility of alternate levels of assistance are anticipated to be subject to additional review <br />and discussions with the developer. The developer has stated that local support from the City will be necessary <br />to be awarded LCDA funds and any potential additional funding sources (i.e. DEED) as the grant funding would <br />be awarded to the City of Little Canada. The grant funds require commitment and submission of the application <br />by the City and with commitment as related to financial participation through TIF. Alternate possibilities for closing <br />the gap are subject to financial feasibility and market conditions including increased deferred developer fee, <br />reduced interest rates, other grant funding sources and increased debt coverage. <br />