Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />NOVEMBER 12, 1997 <br />Morelan asked how much the 14% would net the City over the life of the <br />bonds. The City Administrator pointed out the analysis that he prepared <br />for the Council, and estimated the amount could exceed $1 million versus <br />the $200,000 issuance fee that the City would typically collect and which <br />HADC is requestin~ be waived. The exact amount will be dependent <br />upon future valuations, tax rates, and State determined class rates over the <br />life of the bonds. <br />Fahey pointed out that the 14% is a safety net for the potential decrease in <br />real estate taxes, and supported the recommendation of the City <br />Administrator on this issue. <br />Pedersen pointed out that if the Council took no action and did not <br />approve tax exempt housing revenue bonds, the decrease in real estate <br />taxes would still occur. <br />Morelan asked what will happen with the rents bein~ char~ed at Montreal <br />Courts. <br />Echtenkamp replied that they are proposing no change in rents at this time <br />and felt future changes would not be significant. Goldmark's goal is to <br />decrease the vacancy rate at Montreal Courts. <br />Morelan asked if the 40/60 test must be met throughout the life of the <br />bonds, and asked who was responsible for ensuring that this test is met. <br />Mary Ippel, Bond Counsel, replied that the 40/60 test must be met. If it is <br />not, the bonds would default and would become taxable. Ippel explained <br />that there would be a regulatory agreement in place that must be complied <br />with. A trustee will be appointed, and that trustee will be responsible for <br />ensuring that all requirements are met. Also, any conditions that the City <br />places on this transaction will be spelled out in the loan agreement and can <br />be included in the regulatory agreement if the City desires. <br />Morelan asked the current tenant mix at Montreal Courts. <br />Echtenkamp reported that they last checked the tenant mix in February of <br />this year. At that time, all tenants except for approximately 15 units met <br />low income requirements. Most of the tenants in these 15 units were in <br />the process of building homes and were short-term tenants. <br />The timing of the public hearing at which the Council would be asked to <br />act on the tax exempt housin~; revenue bonds was discussed. It was the <br />consensus of those present that the public hearing would be scheduled for <br />6:30 P.M. on Tuesday, December 2"d. Official notice would be published <br />in the Pioneer Press with an additional notice in the Review. <br />