05-27-98 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUT~S CITY COUNCTL MAY 27, 1998 develop it. Morelan pointed out that the property division only eliminates the option of Leeward Way being extended through to LaBore Road. Fahey asked if the length of tlie cul-de-sac in Option A exceeds the City's standards. The City Planner replied that the cul-de-sac is approximately 500 feet lon~ which meets the standard. Fahey noted tl~at tl~e City must be concerned about lot spliYs which would preclude the development of large tracts of land. However, in this case it appears there are alternatives for developin~ the northern property. Scalze felt that Option A was the best way to develop this area. However, she felt there should be some agreement by the propeity owner that this is how the land to the north would develop in the future. Perhaps this is done Uy obtain the uecessliy road right-of-way easements. Pedersen suggested that the City should restrict how far back the property owner could build a house on the new lot. If a house were setback too far, it would preclude the future extension ofLeeward Way. The Planner indicated that the City could require tliat the property owner at 791 LaBore Road dedicate his portion of the Leeward Way right-of- way. Pahey asI<etl if the property owner would have to p(at the property in order to dedicate with ri~ht-of=way, noting that Leeward Way may not be extei~ded for another 20 years. The Planner replied that a plat would not be required, but the property owner would have to spend additional money having the right-of-way surveyed. The City Administrator suggested that the City require a development agreement recorded against the property relative to the Leeward Way right-of-way. Morelln asked if the Council had ever done a concept review of a property division. The Planner replied that tl~e Council has not done a concept review of simple subdivisions before, and pointed out that the City has reviewed simple subdivisia~s via s]<etcli plans requiring surveys if the subdivisions are approved. The City Administrator indicated that the City's thoroughfare plan for the area has been of concern to this property owner; and, as a result, preferred to proceed very cautiously with tl~e subdivision.