Laserfiche WebLink
MINUT~S <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />JUNE 24, 1998 <br />Doug McMillan replied that it would be 43 feet in width with a 2-foot <br />porch extension. However, the porch extension is not considered as part <br />of the setback. <br />Fahey stated that the Coimcil must be satistied that Residential Business <br />zoning is an appropriate use for the ~rea. Fahey did not feel there was <br />basis for allowing the variance, and did not feel that the fact that the <br />setback would be zero under B-3 zoning was a good reason for granting <br />the variance. Fahey pointed out thtit the lot is 74 f'eet wide, and taking out <br />required setbacks, there is only 34 feet ofbuildable area. <br />Morelan suggested thlt the best solution would be to combine this lot with <br />the one to the east. <br />Doug McMillan pointed out that the lots to tl~e east are used as residential <br />homes and the properties ~lon~ Rosewood Dcive are also residential. It <br />was his thougl~t that Yhe Rl3 zouing 1nd use Yhey are proposing for 89 West <br />County Road C would provide a nice transitional zoning that the <br />neighbors to the north 1nd the east would appreciate. McMillan pointed <br />out that under the B-3 zoning, a commercill use could be developed on the <br />site and that the setbacl< on Che east~ property line could be zero. <br />Fahey stlted thtit he would support the proposal if the setblcks could be <br />met. Fahey indicaCed ChaC he had a problem wiYh rezoning the property to <br />RB if the result is that a vlrilnce will be necessary in order to meet <br />setback require~roents. <br />Dou~ M'cMillan }~oi~ited out that the building wiil be a credit to the area. <br />McMillan acknowledged tl~at a l~ardship must exist to warrant the granting <br />of a vlriance, and pointed out thlt the Iot is 1 lot of record and is very <br />narrow. It will be extremely difficult to develop this property without a <br />variance. <br />Fahey indicated that the City sliould not create a situation that requires the <br />need for a variance, aud rezouin~ the property to RB will put the <br />requirement for larger setbacks in place. ~ahey did not believe the City <br />should create a hardshi}~ by rezoning the property. <br />Jan McMillan stated that she felt the coffeel~ouse would be a nice business <br />to have in Little Canada. It wotiild be an asset to the commimity and <br />would provide a transiYion for Che nei~hborhood rather than having <br />something like a liquor store or other conunercial business adjacent to the <br />residential homes. <br />