Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />JULY 8, 1998 <br />Gibbs indicated that if Medi1 One tool< plant out-of seivice and provided <br />the City uotice of abandomnent, the City could exercise its rights under <br />Section 10 of the franchise agreement to require that plant be removed, <br />Fahey stated that if Media One is representing that they will put their plant <br />undergiaund when other utilities do so, then he was in support of the <br />franchise agreement. Fahey suggested that perhaps the franchise <br />agreement should be clarified to worlc together with the rights-of-way <br />ordinance includinb auy future amendments tl~at the City might make to <br />the ri~hts-of-way ordinance. <br />Gibbs replied that he believed the City had the autharity under its police <br />powers to require the under~roundin~ of cable plant, btrt limited to tlie <br />extei~t thlt it doesn't resuh in more burden on Media One than any otl~er <br />rights-of-way user. Gibbs stated that Media One understands that the <br />fraucl~ise agreement ~nd the ri~hts-of-way ordii~ance must work to~etl~er <br />so that the combin~tion of the two does not put extra burdens on Media <br />One. Gibbs stated that Media O~~e 1cla~owled~es the City's a~itl~ority in <br />Yhis regard. <br />Tl~e City Aciministr<it~or a3reed thlt the fl~anchise lgreement and rights-of- <br />way ordinance must worl< to~ether, and f~irther pointed out that the <br />defiuition of abandonment, i.e. nof being used for transmission, needs to <br />be addressed as well. <br />The City Attorney pointed out the question of ui~dergroundii~~ of newly <br />coustructec( cable TV pl~nt where other utiliCies are not underground. The <br />Attorney pointed out Section 13, paragra~l~ 3 of the fi~lnchise agreement <br />provides for the amendment of the a~reemeut, but suggested Che City <br />might want a written document from Media One agreeing to au <br />amendment to the a~reement. <br />Scalze asl<etl about Yhe definitiou of abandonment. <br />The City Attorney staCed tl~at he was unable to find a definition of <br />abindonment in tl~e franel~ise ~greement. <br />Morelan asl<ed ifthis issue has come up in otlrer cities. <br />Gibbs replied that it l~as noC, and sug~ested that the issue of aba~~donment <br />w1s addressed in State SY~tutes in the early 1980's. Gibbs repoited that <br />tl~e franchise 1~reemen[ h~s been adopted by 5 or 6 of the member cities <br />as it stands, and that Media One is lool<ing for uniformiYy in this <br />agreement witlt the cities. Gibbs indicated that his concept of <br />