My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-12-98 Council Minutes
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1998
>
08-12-98 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/3/2009 5:03:50 PM
Creation date
7/31/2009 2:58:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTGS <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />AUGUST 12, i)98 <br />pro~osal he mal<es should be tinancially fe~sible and should mal<e good <br />business sense for the community. F~hey su~gesCed that if tl~e Cinemark <br />de11 falls apart, the City shoul<t concentrate its retlevelopment elforts on <br />the north side of the street as weil ~s that pa~tion of Rice Street south of <br />County Road C. <br />Lendway a~ain asl<ed the Council to begin Yhinl<in~ about tl~e next step <br />sl~ould the Cinemarl< deal Pall Yhro~igh. <br />Pahey pointed out that the Council should I<now whether or not the <br />Cinemarl< dell wili proceed by its second meetin~ in September. Fahey <br />indicated that at Chis point the Council feels obli~ated to hold the north <br />parcel to see if the Cinemarl< proposal wil) move forward. If iY doesn't, <br />the~i F~hey felT the City sl~o~ild marl;et th~t site. <br />F~hey tisl<ed iPworl< on LitCie Can~da ILo~d should be delayed until the <br />status of tl~e Cinemarl< proposal is I<nown. The City Atlministrator replied <br />that Cinemarl< is comFort'able enougli with t~he site plan they h<roe <br />proposed so that ~.vorl: on Little Canada Ro~id can proceed. <br />AMENDMGNTS The Citv ~~dministrator reviewetl his memo tlnted F~ugust 5, 1998 which <br />TO S~WER & o~idines the amendmenYS proposed l~o the City's sewer and wlter <br />WATER ordinance. These inciude mal<in~ cerfific~tion fees consistent, as well as <br />ORDINANCE as well as ch~nges relative to rates and collecCion of ch~rges for the City's <br />water 1nd sewer systems. <br />Mr. L~Valle introduced the tollowing ordinance and i~~oved its adoption: <br />ORU/NANCG NO. d78 - AN ORUINFiNCB ANI&NDIN~i SECTIONS <br />ZOi.I40 (G), 8ll>.140 (B), 816.070, fIND 76(17.300 T13ROUGH I60I.340 <br />OF I,ITTl.E CfI NADfPS NIUN/C/PA/. CODE RGLATING TO <br />UT/1.l "1'Y RATF..S fI Nl) CO%/,ECTLON OF CHARGL:S' FOR SEWER, <br />REFUSE, FAI,SG fll,f1 KM fI ND If~ATER 13I1,/.,S <br />I'he Foregoin~ ordinance ~.vas duly seconded by Pedersen. <br />Ayes (3) L~Valle, Pedersen, l~ahey. <br />N2ys (0). Resolution ded~red atlopted. <br />Mr. LaV~lle introduced the followin~ resolution and moved its adoption: <br />RE.SOI UT/ON NO. 98-8-192 - RECONF/RM/NG WA%'ER, WATER <br />SF.RV/CE CIIAKGG, fI ND SCWGR Itf1 TES FOR TF/F C77'Y OF <br />I,ITTL&' CAN,1 Dil <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.