Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />SEPT~MB~R 9, 1998 <br />Nays (0), Resolution declared adopted. <br />FUNCTiONAL The City Administrltor reporCed that as pa~t of t~he le~isl~tive mandate <br />CONSOLI- and resultin~ funcYional consolid~tion oi'roadways plan, the C,ounty is <br />DATION turning over Co~inty Roaci E3-3 1'rom Edgerfon Street to Arcade Street, <br />County Road B-2 from Rice Street' t~o Vii:iug Drive, anci Twin L~I<e <br />Bou(evard to the City as City streets. In return, Che County will be <br />up~rading County Road B-2 ii~om Edgerton to Arcade throu~h a recycle <br />project 1nd Coiinty Road B-2 tirom Rice t~o Vil<in~ via ~i patch a sealcoat. <br />The AdminisU'ator noted tl~aY Twin Lal<e C3ou(evard was recycled by the <br />County a Pew ye~rs ~go. "Che City will also receive incre~sed State Aids <br />for these su eets. <br />Morelan asl<ed i1'concrete curb 1nd gutter wili be insfalled on County <br />[Zoad B-3, poinfing out that City ~olicy has been to u~grade from rural <br />rold sections Co ~irb~n wherever possible. The Administr~tor su~~ested <br />that the CiYy Cngineer be ~uChorized to evaluate the installation of concreYe <br />curb antl ~ut~eer where possible ~long C~-2 (EdgerCOn Co Arcacie). <br />"I'he Administrator reporle<i that~ as part of the Gast County Road B-2 <br />recycle project, the A~V~itershecl will be in~l<ing drain~ge im~rovements. <br />`I'here will be some cos~ sharin~ For t~he drainage improvement~s on the part <br />ofthe W~itershe<I, County, an~i the CiCy. `fhe improvemenYS proposed by <br />tl~e W~tersliEd will inal.e dramatic improvements Co draina~e for t0-year <br />rain events or less. However, the improvemenCS ro this arel will never be <br />perfect given the I~I:e elevations. Rainfalls heavier than 10-year events <br />will continue to be problematic. <br />Morel~n asl<ed if the City wo~dd have to assist' in the cost of concrete curb <br />and ~utter. <br />1'he Adininish afor replied thlt Yhis is norm~l ly ~ cost the City wo~ild pay. <br />Morelln commented on the discussion at Che nei~hborhood meeCiug <br />reg~rdin~ Yhe renaming ofCotiint~y Road B-2. Morelln felt since this rold <br />will no longer be a County roacl it sho~ild be ren~med. Fahey felt the City <br />should have ~ hearin~ to ren~ine the road co ensure that the residents along <br />the street are in support of the renamin~. Fahey sug~esCed thlt the B-2 <br />residents be surveyed t~o detErmine if they have an interest in renaming the <br />ro~d. <br />Siml:~ Plisner, 6S I L~.est Count~y Road 13-2, requested thaC the Counci! <br />table action on the ~ccept~nce ofCounty Road B-2 as a City street. <br />Plisner point~e~l out that he is one of the properry owners who will benefit <br />