Laserfiche WebLink
MINUT~S <br />CITY COL7NCIL <br />S~PT,GMF3EI2 9, 1998 <br />Vedersen asl<e<i if curb and ~utter ~,vould be considered for ~Il the turnbacl< <br />streets. 'i~he Administrtitor sug~est~ed t'hat' the City Engineer be authorized <br />to looi< at~ tl~at~ issue. <br />The Aclministrator stafed Yhat he appreciates the concerns raised by Mr. <br />Plisner. However, Che City has h~td very 3ood worl<ing relationships wiTh <br />botl~ Yl~e Co~inty ~nd the WaCershed. Basetl on these trac]< records, he <br />would recommend thaC Yhe turnbac(< resolution be approved this evening. <br />Sc~ize pointed ouY thaf iPche City does not ~pprove the turnbacl< <br />reSOluCion, that doesn't me~n t~l~e Count~y won't t'wn the ro~d over to the <br />City. "I'he Administrator reportetl that that w~is correct, aud pointed out <br />that there is a le~~isialive process est~blisl~ed for Che turning blcl< of these <br />roatlways. <br />N(orelan 1s1<ed what the City would lose by not adopting the turnback <br />resolution 8t this timc. <br />The City Administr~tor pointed out that there wo~ild be a tlelly in getting <br />the road on Che MSA system so that the City co~ild sta~C drawi~~b needs. <br />The Administrata~ indiceted that the City coulci delay adoption of the <br />tin'nbad< resolution, but it w1s his opinion that nothin~ would be gained. <br />"t'he Administr~tor noteci the good relationship the City has had with the <br />CounYy, and he had no tloubt tl~at the Co~inty would follow thro~igh on <br />~~vl~~t they have inclicatetl they wi(I do. 7'he Atlministrator also pointed out <br />thaYthe Watershed hsis already done a IoY to correcY dr~inl~e ~~roblems in <br />ti~is tu'ea, and he w~s conti~{ent Yhey, too, would fo(Iow through with their <br />plans. <br />F1hey su~gested that the Cit~y ~dd a st~tement to the resolut~ion stipulatin~ <br />that tl~e worl: the County is planning for Co~inty Ro~d B-2 be com~leted in <br />1999, and that dr~ine~e improvements coi~templated by the W1Yershed <br />must also be com~~leted. I~'ahey pointetl out that t~here is a lo~~g history <br />with Che dr<tin~~e iii this area, ~nd Pelt th~t ro~d shoultl not be twned over <br />Co the City in a less than acceptable st~~te. <br />The Administrator indicated that ~iven th~t the drainage in this area is <br />comin~ fi~on'~ 1 greater area Chan just the ro~tlway, the Watershed is <br />agreeable to participating in t~he cost of tlraina~e improvements. <br />Morelan ~,>ointed out~ t~hat the Watershed's involvemenY in the drainlge <br />issues does not change re~~ardiess of who o~vns Che roadw~y. <br />8 <br />