Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE WORKSHOP MEETING <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />LITTLE CANADA, MINNESOTA <br />SEPTEMBER 8, 1999 <br />Pursuant to due call and notice thereof a workshop meetin~ of the City <br />Council of Little Canada, Minnesota was held on the 8th day of <br />September, 1999 in the Council Chambers of the City Center located at <br />515 Little Canada Road in said City. <br />Mayor Michael I. Fahey called the meeting to order at 6:30 P.M. and the <br />following members of the City Council were present at roll call: <br />CITY COiJNCIL: Mayor Mr. Michael I. Fahey <br />Council Member Mr. Jim LaValle <br />Council Member Mr. Steve Morelan <br />Council Member Mr. Bob Pedersen <br />Council Member Mrs . Beverly Scalze <br />ALSO PRESENT: City Administrator Mr. Joel R. Hanson <br />Public Works Dir. Mr. Greg Schroeder <br />Parks & Rec Dir. Mr. Jim Morelan <br />Fire Chief Mr. Dick Boss <br />Zoning Administrator Ms. Elizabeth Mursko <br />Accountant Ms. Julie Manville-Camp <br />Cable TV Producer Mr. Jamie Green <br />Deputy Clerk Mrs. Kathy Glanzer <br />2000 BUDGET The City Administrator presented the Council with the preliminary 2000 <br />Budget. He pointed out that the budget follows the recommendation of <br />the Debt Levy Reduction Committee, and provides for the use of $102,000 <br />in debt levy reduction funds to reduce the tax levy. A portion of the debt <br />levy reduction is also being used to offset the past use of reserves in <br />balancing the General Fund. <br />The Administrator reported that the 2000 Bud~;et provides for a reduction <br />in the City's tax rate of almost 12.25% and a net levy reduction of 8.20%. <br />The City has had a zero percent net levy increase the past few years, and <br />the 2000 Bud~et will achieve a net levy reduction. <br />Some of the reasons for the reduction are a projected increase in General <br />Fund revenues of 6.7%. That amount is up by 5.35% utilizing the DLRC <br />recommendation of a$23,000 increase for operationai costs and $66,000 <br />to eliminate the 1999 bud~eted use of prior year's reserves. Another <br />positive is that the proposed Sheriffl s Contract is projected to decline by <br />