My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-10-99 Council Workshop Minutes
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
11-10-99 Council Workshop Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/3/2009 5:12:24 PM
Creation date
7/31/2009 2:59:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />NOVEMBER 10, 1999 <br />Council discussed this fee and agreed with the proposed increase as well <br />as the elimination of the additional fee of $15.00 per hour for rentals over <br />six hours in duration. <br />Council next discussed the proposed increase in On-Sale Liquor License <br />fee from $2,750 to $3,000. It was noted that a public hearing will have to <br />be held in order to consider the increase of this fee. <br />The Administrator reviewed the increase in auto repair fee from $100 to <br />$150 per year, and indicated that the increase is based on the significant <br />amount of stafftime required for code enforcement relative to auto repair <br />businesses. <br />Scalze commented on the part-time assistant budgeted for the Fire Marshal <br />during 200. The Administrator pointed out that that option was discussed <br />at the last budget workshop meeting. A part-time assistant will allow for <br />increased fire inspection coverage of the City's businesses. The <br />Administrator also noted that the Fire Marshal is planning an extended <br />leave during 2000, and the assistant will perform the Fire Marshal's duties <br />during this time period. <br />The City Administrator reported that a General Fund surplus of <br />approximately $65,545 is projected for 1999, and he is recommending a <br />transfer to the General Capital Improvement Fund of that amount. <br />Morelan asked why MSA Funds and Low Income Housin~ Aid are not <br />included in the cash flow reserve calculation. The Administrator indicated <br />that these funds could be included, but noted that this would lessen the <br />funds going into reserves. <br />Morelan asked about the HACA penalty. The City Administrator <br />explained that the penalty is a result of the Presbyterian Homes project, <br />and noted that Presbyterian Homes reimbursed the City for this penalty at <br />the time of the projects. <br />The Administrator reviewed the General Capital Improvement Fund, <br />noting that the recommendation of the Debt Levy Reduction Committee <br />has been utilized in budgeting for this fund. The Administrator noted that <br />there is a slight surplus in the fund for 2000, with a growing deficit in the <br />succeeding four years. He also noted some new major expenditures from <br />this fund, those being for new trail development and the upgrade of <br />existing trails. The Administrator noted that in order to accommodate the <br />General Capital Improvement Plan as proposed, a transfer from the <br />Infrastructure Capital Improvement Fund is being proposed. ffthe <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.