Laserfiche WebLink
7 <br />Schletty Drive, and that failure to comply with this condition be grounds for immediate <br />revocation of the Special Home Occupation Permit. <br /> <br />If City Hall is to continue serving as the designated parking area, staff recommends that Lake <br />Phalen Rowing enter into a formal written use agreement with the City of Little Canada, <br />subject to review and approval by the City Council. At a minimum, the agreement should <br />include language indemnifying the City and require that the organization list the City as an <br />additional insured on its insurance policy. <br /> <br /> <br />5. To Permit the Use of Non-Resident Employees with Operating the Occupation <br />The applicant is seeking approval for two volunteer coaches, who do not reside on the property, <br />to assist with youth instruction. Staff does not have significant concerns with the involvement <br />of non-resident personnel, as this does not, on its own, appear incompatible with residential <br />use. <br /> <br />However, staff is concerned about the property owners’ stated lack of involvement. They are <br />not coaches, employees, or board members of Lake Phalen Rowing. As a result, they have been <br />unable to clearly articulate the full scope of the organization’s operations, including the <br />anticipated timeline of activity on Lake Gervais and the current or future extent of adult <br />programming. This lack of clarity complicates staff’s ability to assess the long-term impacts of <br />the use and reinforces the importance of applying clear limits and conditions to ensure <br />compatibility with the residential setting. <br /> <br />Furthermore, because the homeowners are not actively involved in managing the club, it is <br />unclear to what extent they can ensure that the use of their property will remain compliant with <br />the terms of the permit. Their limited oversight role reduces accountability and raises concerns <br />about the City’s ability to enforce conditions if violations occur. <br /> <br />6. Other Considerations Which Affect the General Welfare of the Surrounding <br />Neighborhood <br />As noted in the Outside Agency Review section, lake-related noise is traditionally regulated at <br />the county level in Minnesota. However, Ramsey County does not have a noise ordinance that <br />applies to Lake Gervais. In the absence of county regulation, regulation of noise-related <br />concerns falls to the City. <br /> <br />If Lake Phalen Rowing were accessing the lake through a public facility such as Lake Gervais <br />County Park, the City would have limited authority to regulate the use of megaphones unless it <br />amended its noise ordinance to address such activity. <br /> <br />In this case, however, the activity originates from a private residence and is subject to review as <br />a Special Home Occupation. Because the applicants are seeking permission to use their <br />property in a more intensive manner than typically allowed in residential areas, the City has <br />clear authority to impose reasonable conditions to protect neighborhood character and ensure <br />compatibility with surrounding uses. <br /> <br />Staff believes it is appropriate to prohibit the use of megaphones, bullhorns, or other devices <br />that amplify voices during instruction. Given the proximity of neighboring homes and the way <br />sound travels across open water, amplified voice projection creates a disproportionate impact <br />on the general welfare of nearby properties. Staff recommends that a condition be included in <br />the permit explicitly prohibiting the use of such devices.