Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> Larkin Hoffman 12/16/2009 10;43 PAGE 004/008 Fax Server <br /> Mayor Bill Blesener <br /> Shelly Boss, Council Member <br /> john Keis, Council Member <br /> Michael McCrraw, Council Member <br /> Rick Montour, Council Member <br /> December 16, 2009 <br /> Page 3 <br /> the City that each wall must stand on its own merits, there was no pot of money for walls that <br /> would allow substitutions and that federal regulations would not allow this type ofhorse-trading, <br /> In short, MnDOT was informing the City Administrator that no legal or factual basis existed for <br /> his proposal. <br /> Moreover, MnDOT officials reconfirmed to the City at this workshop that the Country Drive <br /> noise walls met all federal criteria. A council member indicated his belief that Quebec <br /> Apartments' parcel was a "blighted property that is likely to be redeveloped" and suggested that <br /> the wall be eliminated. No legal or factual basis was offered by this council member for his <br /> assertion. Again, MnDOT officials responded by reconfirming that the noise wall for Quebec <br /> Apartments was "both cost-effective and acoustically effective," The final word by MnDOT on <br /> the subject at the workshop was that the City could request noise wall deletions, but that it may <br /> trigger an environmental justice issue. <br /> 2004 <br /> On January 26, 2004, the City held a required public hearing on the subject of whether it would <br /> give its consent to the Project and the conditions that the City would impose on its consent, On <br /> April 9, 2004, the City Administrator and the City Public Works Director reported to the Mayor <br /> and City Council members regarding their recommendations for the City's consent. 'These <br /> recommendations included a City request to MnDOT for deletion of two noise walls on Country <br /> Drive. With respect to the Quebec Apartments noise wall, City staff said that it would be "a <br /> uisual distraction and provide minimal benefit to the community." These assertions were <br /> unsupported by any evidence and contradicted the objective euidence gathered and presented by <br /> MnDOT in its EA. There also apparently was no attempt to address how the City or MnDOT <br /> could avoid the legal obligation to build the walls, given that the criteria established for the noise <br /> walls were shown to haue been met. <br /> On April 14, 2004, the City Council adopted a resolution giving its municipal consent to the <br /> Project and agreeing to participate in costs associated with the Project, subject to several <br /> expressly-stated conditions. One of the conditions was that MnDOT should delete the two noise <br /> walls on Country Drive. The resolution provided for an exception W the deletion of the Quebec <br /> Apartments noise wall "should there be an environmental justice requirement for that wall." <br /> Quebec Apartments received no notice of the City's decision to request deletion of the noise wall <br /> from the Project as part of the City's municipal consent. <br /> 2007-08 <br /> In December 2007, Theodore Zinner, one of Quebec's general partners, asked the City <br /> administrator when construction on the noise wall for Quebec Apartments would begin. In <br /> January 2008 the City Administrator disclosed to Quebec that MnDOT had deleted the wall from <br /> <br />