My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-08-10 Planning Comm. Agenda
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2010
>
04-08-10 Planning Comm. Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/2/2010 10:08:48 AM
Creation date
4/2/2010 10:06:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2. The PUD zoning designation may discourage redevelopment interest as <br /> developers are often concerned that planned unit development will mean higher <br /> City expectations and resulting increased development costs. <br /> 3. The existing B-3 zoning designation applied to the subject property currently <br /> provides a means to implement the City's Land Use Plan. Thus, most of the <br /> same long term land use objectives could be achieved without the use of planned <br /> unit development. <br /> 4. Typically, PUD projects involve a greater level of City administration/involvement <br /> than projects subject to standard zoning. Such involvement may increase <br /> processing costs. <br /> CONCLUSION <br /> <br /> There are both advantages and disadvantages to applying a planned unit development <br /> (PUD) zoning designation to the subject property. <br /> Primary advantages to applying a PUD zoning designation relate to the ability of the <br /> City to be flexible in terms of its land use and development standards (which may <br /> increase developer interest in the area). Such flexibility commonly results in a higher <br /> quality development product than what could otherwise be achieved via standard <br /> zoning. <br /> A primary disadvantage associated with PUD zoning relates to a possible developer <br /> perception that PUD zoning will escalate development costs. Other disadvantages <br /> include increased administrative costs (associated with greater City involvement) and a <br /> possible need to amend the Comprehensive Plan. <br /> Pc: Kathy Glanzer <br /> Steve Westerhaus <br /> Lee Elfering <br /> 5 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.