Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> MINUTES <br /> CITY COUNCIL <br /> <br /> APRIL 14, 2010 <br /> Discussion was had on a possible reduction in the Fire Department budget. <br /> The City Adminisriator reported that he discussed the budget adjustments <br /> with the Fire Chiei; but has not heard back as of tonight's meeting. <br /> The Council discussed the reduction in Par]< Consultant Fees of $15,000, <br /> and it was the consensus of the Council to retain that reduction. <br /> The reduction for Fire Relief Contribution of $21,924 was also retained as <br /> it is assumed the required contribution will fall to below our $15,000 <br /> commitment. <br /> The Council discussed the proposed increase in electric franchise fee that <br /> would raise an additional $55,900 in revenue. The Administrator reported <br /> that he had one comment fiom a resident indicating his preference for an <br /> increase in property taxes rather than the franchise fee, as property taxes <br /> are a deductible expense. The Administrator reported that in his <br /> discussions with Xcel Energy, a June 1s` implementation date for this <br /> increase appeared feasible. The Administrator pointed out that a public <br /> hearing and ordinance amendment will be necessary to implement the <br /> increase. <br /> Blesener felt that an increase in the franchise fee may be more palatable <br /> than a 2% to 3% increase in property taxes. The Finance Director noted <br /> that the franchise fee increase is more of a burden on commercial <br /> properties in the City than on residential. Montour noted that the total <br /> franchise fee on a residential property, including the increase being <br /> considered, is less than $50, which would not result in much of a <br /> deduction on income taxes. Blesener noted that those property owners <br /> taking the standard deduction would see no benefit. <br /> The City Administrator also pointed out that revenue generated from the <br /> franchise fee goes into the City's Infrastructure Fund. IIe further noted <br /> the costs associated with burying power lines come from that account, <br /> which is a direct correlation to the franchise fee on electrical. 'fhe <br /> Adminish~ator reported that there are two sn•etches of power lines that will <br /> need to be buried, and the associated costs a~~e estimated at $600,000 to <br /> $700,000. <br /> Blesener stated that he would prefer to work toward a 0% levy increase <br /> and retain the increase in the franchise fee. Montour indicated that it may <br /> be difficult do achieve a 0% levy increase. The City Administrator agreed <br /> noting the uncertainty with local government aids, and the need to restore <br /> City fund balances. <br /> The Council discussed the City's Infrastructure Fund and the level of <br /> street reconstruction/replacement that will be necessary in the next few <br /> 3 <br /> <br />