My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-28-10 Council Minutes
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2010
>
04-28-10 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/10/2010 1:55:50 PM
Creation date
5/10/2010 1:54:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> MINUTES <br /> <br /> CITY COUNCIL <br /> <br /> APRIL 28, 2Q10 <br /> noted that the street width being discussed tonight is based upon a "face- <br /> to-face" measurement. However, when measuring from "back to back" <br /> the width impact varies depending on type of curbing used, surmountable <br /> or barrier. <br /> The City Engineer reviewed diagrams illustrating the impact on street <br /> width relative to the type of curbing used. That impact is as follows: <br /> 28-foot Pavement Width with <br /> Surmountable Curb - 30.92 feet <br /> Barrier Curb - 29.33 feet <br /> 26-foot Pavement Width with <br /> Surmountable Curb - 28.92 feet <br /> Barrier Curb - 27.33 feet <br /> 24-foot Pavement Width with <br /> Surmowrtable Curb - 26.92 feet <br /> Barrier Curb - 25.33 feet <br /> The City Engineer stated that it was his opinion that a 26 foot pavement <br /> width was as narrow as the City should go if parking is to be allowed on <br /> both sides of the street. He noted the difficulty in restricting on-street <br /> parking as expectations change as property ownership changes. <br /> There was discussion about whether barrier or surmountable curb should <br /> be utilized. It was noted that the City has allowed property owners to <br /> choose the type of curbing, although both the City Engineer and the Public <br /> Works Department prefers barrier curbing. In the case of the Bryan Street <br /> neighborhood, the property owners prefer surmountable curbing. Blesener <br /> noted that the barrier curbing would have less of an impact given the <br /> narrower footprint of the street. Keis pointed out that surmountable <br /> curbing has been utilized in neighborhoods where there is some question <br /> of driveway locations. In the Bryan Street neighborhood, driveways are <br /> established. Keis stated that he preferred the barrier curb style. <br /> Keis summarized research that he did on the issue of pavement width <br /> which he indicated mirrors the research findings of the City Administrator. <br /> He cited an Oregon study that discusses the fact that pavement widths are <br /> narrowing given water quality issues related to run-off. The study also <br /> discusses the need to provide access for emergency vehicles, snowplows, <br /> ga~•bage trucks, eta Keis stated that he did not feel the City should restrict <br /> parking on Bryan Street. He indicated that he could support a 26 foot <br /> pavement width on this particular street, with the pavement at 24 feet at <br /> the corner of Bryan Street and Jackson Street, widening to 26 feet and then <br /> 15 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.