Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> NIIIVUTI?S <br /> CITY C®UIVCII, <br /> li~iay 2S, 200fi <br /> Currently they have 18 vehicles on the site. Rossow reported that <br /> typically vehicles are only in storage for a day. However, if vehicles are <br /> forfeited there is an approximately 45 day process that Auto Rescue goes <br /> through to gain title to the vehicle. It is then sold or taken to the scrap <br /> yard. Rossow noted that at the Planning Commission meeting Auto <br /> Rescue indicated that they have had a vehicle or two longer than that when <br /> they are being held by a police department as part of an investigation or a <br /> DWI forfeiture. <br /> Allan asked about Quality Contracting's outdoor storage area (#1 on the <br /> site plan). She noted that the Quality Contracting property has a split <br /> zoning of I-1 and I-P, and asked if that was problematic under the Code. <br /> The Code limits off-site outdoor storage to I-1 properties only. The City <br /> Planner agreed that there is a split zoning on the Quality Contracting <br /> property, but noted that the use of the property is entirely I-1. That use <br /> was grandfathered in when the property was owned and used by Frattalone <br /> Companies. Allan expressed concern that allowing off-site outdoor <br /> storage to Quality Contracting when a portion of their property is zoned <br /> I-P would set a precedent. The Planner again noted the I-1 use of the <br /> entire site which has been grandfathered in. The Planner reported that the <br /> City rezoned a portion of this site to I-P in anticipation of future <br /> redevelopment of that portion of the property. He indicated that the Code <br /> states the owner of the storage material must own and operate a business <br /> in Little Canada that is zoned I-1. The Planner felt that Quality <br /> Contracting meets this ordinance provision since a portion of the property <br /> is zoned I-1 and the business use is I-1 in nature. The City Attorney stated <br /> that he agreed with the interpretation of the City Planner. <br /> There was no one present wishing to comment on this matter. <br /> Upon motion by Allan, seconded by Keis, the public hearing was closed. <br /> Montour asked if all three businesses will be required to obtain outdoor <br /> storage licenses. The City Planner replied that they would. The outdoor <br /> storage license will be issued to the business, the CUP for outdoor storage <br /> and the IUP for off-site outdoor storage will be issued to the property <br /> owner. <br /> Montour asked how the City can protect itself from outdoor storage <br /> enforcement problems under the new Code. The Planner noted that <br /> outdoor storage will be required to be licensed. If there are enforcement <br /> problems, the City can chose to either revoke or not renew these licenses. <br /> Rossow noted that his rental agreement allows him to revoke a lease for <br /> illegal activities. If outdoor storage is out-of compliance, he would <br /> consider it to be i]legal and would enforce that provision of the rental <br /> agreement. <br /> 5 <br /> <br />