Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />NOVEMBER 10, 2010 <br />finalizing the sign plan with his tenants. He would bring that plan back to <br />the Council for review and approval at a later date. <br />Mr. McGraw introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION N0.201041 -273 TABLING ACTION ON AN <br />AMENDMENT TO PUD PERMIT FOR EXPANSION OF <br />FREESTANDING SIGN AT THE MARKET PLACE SHOPPING <br />CENTER, 2900 RICE STREET, PENDING RECEIPT OF A 60 -DAY <br />WAIVER AGREEMENT FROM MR. GROOTWASSINK, WITH THE <br />REQUEST TO BE BROUGHT BACK BEFORE THE COUNCIL <br />WHEN MR. GROOTWASSINK SUBMITS HIS FINAL SIGN PLAN <br />FOR ACTION, AND NOTING THAT THE REQUEST IS HEREBY <br />DENIED SHOULD MR. GROOTWASSINK NOT SUBMIT THE 60- <br />DAY WAIVER WITHIN THE NEXT FEW DAYS <br />The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Montour. <br />Ayes (5). <br />Nays (0). Resolution declared adopted. <br />AMEND CUP Mayor Blesener opened the Public Hearing to consider the application of <br />R.J. Marco for an Amendment to Conditional Use Permit for minor auto <br />ARCHITEC repair and Architectural Review for the expansion of Vroom Motors. The <br />TURAL Planning Commission recommended approval of the CUP and <br />REVIEW Architectural Review subject to compliance with the recommendations of <br />VROOM the City Planner and City Engineer. <br />MOTORS <br />The City Planner reported the R.J. Marco, owner of the building at 2600 <br />Rice Street is requesting an Amendment to Conditional Use Permit and <br />Architectural Review in order to construct a 1,860 square foot addition <br />onto their building to accommodate expanded space for Vroorn Motors. <br />The Planner noted that the addition would occur on the east side of the <br />building. The parking lot would also be expanded to the east to provide <br />for an additional 8 parking spaces. The City Engineer is working with R.J. <br />Marco on storm water management issues on site. The City Planner noted <br />that the Planning Commission recommended approval as does City staff. <br />He pointed out that conditions of approval include those that are still <br />relevant from the original CUP approval for this property which occurred <br />in 2000. The Planner noted that any changes to the commercial signage <br />would require a separate planning action. The property owner is not <br />proposing any at this time, other than some relocation of directional <br />signage. <br />23 <br />5 <br />