Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />AUGUST 10, 2011 <br />recreation programs would be the first candidate with the other two <br />following. <br />Morris then reviewed the results of the questions related to support for tax <br />increases for selected services. 44% favored a tax increase for selected <br />services and 48% opposed. 9% was unsure. The support was for a <br />median increase in property taxes of 2 %. Morris indicated that <br />statistically this was a tie. When asked if there was support for a tax <br />increase to maintain services, 30% favored an increase while 56% <br />opposed. Morris indicated that this was a common response across the <br />metro area and Ramsey County. When asked if residents supported <br />service cuts, 18% favored cuts, while 65% opposed. This is a three -to -one <br />opposition to service cuts, even if property taxes would decrease. <br />Residents were asked to rate the level of City property taxes, and 43% felt <br />taxes were on the high side, 38% average, 2% low, and 18% unsure. <br />Morris indicated that he would classify this as a benign rating indicating <br />that a high rating of 50% would be hostile and 70% would be very hostile. <br />Morris stated that they have not seen low ratings in the neighborhood of <br />20% to 30% for the past 15 years. <br />Residents then rated the value of City services and 80% rated those <br />services at excellent to good. Morris indicated that this is among the <br />highest rating in the metro area. <br />Morris then noted that residents were asked to comment on support for <br />partnerships versus maintaining the City's identity. He noted that while <br />39% supported partnerships, 24% supported maintaining the City's <br />identity. 33% wanted to do both. Morris felt that the results showed that <br />while some partnerships are good, some would not be viewed as good, <br />especially if there was an impact to community identity. <br />When asked about public safety concerns, 46% indicated that there were <br />unsafe areas in the City while 52% stated that there were not. Morris <br />indicated that in applying demographic profiles to these answers, public <br />safety was a concern for people over 55 years of age, and women less than <br />35 years of age. In identifying unsafe areas, Morris noted that some rose <br />to the top with Montreal Courts being mentioned by 1 in 5 responders. <br />Trails and parks were also mentioned as was the Rice Street area. Morris <br />felt that Montreal Courts was a definite red flag. Respondents were also <br />asked to list specific public safety concerns. 34% indicated no concerns, <br />22% listed residential crime, 15% youth crime and vandalism, and 11% <br />drugs. Morris indicated that the 11% concern about drugs was a little high <br />with 5% being the suburban norm. People were then asked about crime <br />over the past five years, with 60% indicated that crime has remained about <br />4 <br />