My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-24-11 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2011
>
08-24-11 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/9/2014 1:43:25 PM
Creation date
8/22/2011 7:57:29 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
137
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />,JULY 27, 2011 <br />Blesener noted that should an incident occur, the City has no liability <br />relative to this matter. The Administrator replied that that was correct. <br />The Administrator indicated that the goal in requiring increased limits <br />would be to protect individuals who might be injured because of a liquor <br />claim. The Administrator indicated that the Council could consider a <br />change in the minimum limits the City requires or wait for a <br />recommendation from the League. <br />The Council considered this matter and the consensus was to wait until the <br />League makes a recommendation. <br />STORAGE The City Planner reported that there will be a request on the August <br />CONTAINERS Planning Commission meeting for a Conditional Use permit to allow <br />IN THE outdoor storage for a business in the I -P District. That request includes <br />1 -1) being allowed to maintain a storage container. The City Planner noted <br />DISTRICT that while the Light - Industrial (I -1) District spells out specific conditions <br />for storage containers, the Industrial -Park (I -P) District is silent on storage <br />containers. The Planner noted City staff's memo dated July 22, 2011 <br />which spells out the specific I -1 standards relative to storage containers. <br />The Planner asked if the Council has a desire to include storage container <br />standards in the I -P District. <br />The City Administrator noted that requests for storage containers in the <br />I -P District are currently considered on a case -by -case basis. He asked if <br />the Council preferred to have specific standards in place in that district. <br />Keis noted that the amount of outdoor storage in I -P is much more limited <br />than I -1. Keis asked if the City wanted to allow storage containers in I -P. <br />The City Planner noted that the currently the 1 -P District is silent on <br />containers. The Planner indicated that if rules are adopted, they could be <br />the same or similar to those spelled out in the I -1 District. <br />Blesener asked if the City wanted to allow storage containers in I -P. Keis <br />felt storage containers were preferable to having stuff stored on pallets. <br />The Planner agreed that storage containers resolve some concerns and <br />provide more assurance of a clean site. The downside is that storage <br />containers may he used as a replacement to constructing a building. It was <br />noted, however, that the amount of outdoor storage allowed in I -P is much <br />less than what is allowed in I -1. <br />Blesener asked the Location of the City's I -P Districts. The Planner noted <br />that most I -P properties are in the Slumberland area and west of the <br />freeway in the area of the former Knox property. <br />12 <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.