My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-14-11 Council Workshop Minutes
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2011
>
09-14-11 Council Workshop Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/11/2011 3:19:22 PM
Creation date
9/28/2011 11:12:45 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />SEPTEMBER 14, 2011 <br />noted that this will appear as a property value reduction on tax statements. <br />While the value exclusion lowers the City's tax base, the tax rate will <br />increase even at a 0% gross tax levy. The tax burden will be shifted to <br />higher valued homes as well as to commercial properties. The Director <br />noted that given that the City of St. Paul has a large amount of lower <br />valued homes, tax burden in Ramsey County is being shifted to the <br />suburbs. <br />The Director then reviewed Local Government Aid (LGA) over the past <br />four years, noting that the LGA certified to be received in 2012 is 36.44% <br />of what was certified for 2009. The Director compared the funding levels <br />that the State certified for this time period with what was actually realized, <br />pointing out that the City was above to absorb these decreases during this <br />time period. The Director noted it is anyone's guess whether or not the <br />City will receive the full $195,843 in LGA certified by the State for 2012. <br />She noted that under the 0% gross levy increase, the City has budgeted an <br />allowance of 30% in cuts in LGA. The Director pointed out that this <br />results in a 0% gross levy increase. If the City budget fully relied on the <br />certified LGA amount, a -2.26% gross levy reduction would result. If <br />there was no reliance on LGA, then the gross levy would increase by <br />5.29 %. <br />Blesener pointed out that the City's budget surpluses are typically the <br />result of conservative budgeting. This conservative budgeting has been a <br />means of protecting the City to a certain extent from impacts of the State <br />cutting LGA after it has certified LGA amounts to cities. The Director <br />replied that that was a fair statement. She also pointed out the City's <br />effort to keep levied amounts on an even stance and avoid big fluctuations <br />in the levy. Montour pointed out that the $195,000 LGA line item in <br />Intergovernmental General Fund Revenues. The Director noted that the <br />City would be relying on up to $137,000 of this revenue as part of the <br />2012 Budget reflecting the 0% gross levy increase. This would generate a <br />$58,000 surplus in LGA. <br />The City Administrator noted that one of the City's goals is to reduce <br />dependence on LGA, and the City is doing this in the 2012 Budget. He <br />noted that the City has never budgeted for full reliance on the certified <br />LGA amount and pointed out the State's decrease in certified LGA <br />amounts since 2009. The Administrator noted that to totally eliminate <br />reliance on LGA would require a gross levy increase, and stated that this is <br />not the time to do so. He reported that in a meeting of suburban Ramsey <br />County cities, he learned that the majority are proposing 0% levy <br />increases, some a decreasing their levies, and some are increasing up to <br />4 %. The Administrator pointed out that should the City enact a 0% gross <br />levy increase, any property tax increase that property owners see will be <br />the result of actions by the State or increases by other taxing jurisdictions. <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.