Laserfiche WebLink
MEMORANDUM <br />TO: Mayor Blesener & Members of the City Council <br />FROM: Joel Hanson, City Administrator <br />DATE: February 22, 2008 <br />RE: Nuisance Abatement for 122 Demont, Unit # 274 <br />The Fire Marshal and Building Official have been dealing with a serious condition in the above reference <br />condo unit. Specifically, the owner has removed much of the sheet rock from the walls in the unit. In <br />many cases, the sheetrock serves as the fire barrier as required by the building code. Its removal increases <br />the ability of fire to spread to other units in the complex. Another concern is that there is an extensive <br />amount of exposed wiring in the unit. Again, this increases the fire hazard for the complex. Still another <br />issue is a header was removed from one of the windows. This jeopardized the structural integrity of the <br />building (this condition has been temporarily addressed by the association). Finally, there is a significant <br />amount of clutter that limits ingress /egress for the unit. <br />The unit has been posted as "unsafe" and no occupancy is allowed until the necessary corrective action <br />occurs. Electricity has also been shut -off to this unit to eliminate some if the tire hazard associated with <br />exposed wiring. A corrective order was also posted at the site and mailed to the owner back on the 9th of <br />January. The owner signed the return receipt on February 11th, but has not made any contact with the City. <br />Staff has also been in contact with the townhome association. Due to the mortgage on the property, they <br />would be at significant financial risk if they returned the unit to an appropriate condition. Therefore, staff <br />believes the City needs to take action if this matter is to be resolved. It should also be noted that we are in a <br />better position than the association to recover our costs given the priority assessments from a municipality <br />take in relation to other interests should a foreclosure result. Specifically, property taxes come first, special <br />assessment second, and then the interests of the mortgagor. <br />In discussing this situation with the City Attorney, he feels we should pursue abatement of the nuisance. <br />Given our previous actions and in light of our Nuisance Code, Chapter 603 (copy attached), I have asked <br />him to verify that we have complied with the 10 -day notice to ensure that we are in a position to assess the <br />costs. Be will report on this at Wednesday's meeting. If we need an additional notice, we will have to <br />continue this matter until our first meeting in March. Otherwise, we can order the abatement at this <br />meeting. <br />I have attached the correspondence on this matter for your review. Depending on the advice of the City <br />Attorney, we will need to adopt a resolution ordering the abatement with appropriate findings. If we are <br />good to go at this time, I will have this ready for the additions to the agenda on Wednesday night. <br />1 <br />