My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-27-2007 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2007
>
06-27-2007 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/8/2011 10:34:45 AM
Creation date
11/8/2011 9:38:50 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
220
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC. <br />4800 Olson Memorial Highway, Suite 202, Golden Valley, MN 55422 <br />Telephone: 763.231 .2555 Facsimile: 763.231 .2561 planners @nacplanning.com <br />MEMORANDUM <br />TO: Little Canada Planning Commission <br />FROM: Stephen Grittman <br />DATE: June 7, 2007 <br />RE: Little Canada — Wittner Front Yard Setback Variance <br />FILE NO: 758.09 - 07.19 <br />Background and Analysis <br />Paul and Jody Wittner have requested a variance from the front yard setback standard <br />of 30 feet in the R -1 Zoning District to accommodate an addition to their kitchen. The <br />applicants estimate that the resulting front setback would be 27 feet from the right of <br />way line with a 10 foot building addition. This estimate is based on the applicants <br />measurement, but is not verified by survey. <br />The Zoning Ordinance requires that any request for variance is supported by a showing <br />that there is a unique condition on the property that creates a hardship in putting the <br />property to reasonable use. To approve the proposed variance, the City must find that <br />the applicant's proposal represents reasonable use of the property, and that it is not <br />practical to achieve the objectives of the plan without violating the ordinance standards. <br />The ordinance further states that the conditions must not be of the making of the <br />applicant, and that economic considerations cannot be the basis for the request. <br />The applicants suggest that they would like to expand the kitchen, which is currently in <br />the front of the home, with a stairway behind it. They state that their designer has <br />advised them that expansion of a lesser dimension would not be cost effective, nor <br />provide an adequate expansion area. <br />The building sits on the property with a similar setback to other homes along this section <br />of Demont Avenue. The lot is question is very deep, with a relatively steep grade to the <br />north. Expansion of the home would be possible to the north, although it would create a <br />more expensive addition based on the existing layout of the home. <br />From the perspective of planning staff, the variance does not appear to be justified for <br />two primary reasons. First, while the applicants would like to expand their kitchen, it <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.