04-25-2007 Additions - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

11. The proposal threatens the general welfare of the community through its use of public resources in inspection, enforcement, and prosecution of the history of violations attendant to the proposed Conditional Use. 12, The proposal threatens the public health and safety based on the property's historic pattern of zoning and building violations which create dangers to employees, visitors, and public emergency services personnel that may visit the site, 13. The proposal is not consistent with the zoning ordinance requirement the proposed use avoid overburdening the City's service capacity, due to past history with the same use on the subject property. 14. The Conditional Use Permits may not be issued or utilized since the City is limited in the issuance of motor vehicle sales lot licenses for this particular use to a maximum of 4 licenses, and has no additional available licenses. 15. The proposal is not consistent with the zoning ordinance requirement that the proposed use is architecturally compatible with surrounding buildings, based on City plans to require significant improvements to site planning and architectural standards for the area. 16. The proposal fails to comply with the zoning requirement that all motor vehicle sales lots and parking locations be paved, as required by §911.040, H.2.. 17. The proposal fails to comply with the zoning requirement that curbing surround all motor vehicle sales lots and parking lot areas, as required by §911.040, H.S. 18. The proposal fails to comply with the zoning requirement that screening shall be required, as required by §911.040, H.6. 19. As to the requested Text Amendment, the applicant has failed to demonstrate that circumstances in the B -2, B -3, B -4 and 1 -1 Districts have changed significantly enough to necessitate the passage of the Text Amendment increasing the number of motor vehicles sales lot licenses from four to five. Therefore, the request for the Text Amendment is denied. 20. Based on observances by City Staff as documented in the code enforcement officer's report dated April 25, 2007, Valor has to continued to repair vehicles without the required Motor Vehicle Repair License (Municipal Code Chapter 803) since non - renewal on September 27, 2006. 21. Based on documentation provided by the Minnesota Department of Motor Vehicle Licensing, Valor Enterprises does not possess a retail or wholesale dealer's license at this time. 22. Based on Little Canada Municipal Code Chapter 803 entitled Used Car Sales, the applicant has continually demonstrated his inability to comply with provisions related to "Operation Location" and "Responsibility of Operation ". - 1 8 -