Laserfiche WebLink
WI -lO I Electromagnetic fields and public health Page 2 of 4. <br />The strength of RF fields is greatest at its source, and diminishes quickly <br />with distance. Access near base station antennas is restricted where RF <br />signals may exceed international exposure limits. Recent surveys have <br />indicated that RF exposures from base stations and wireless technologies <br />in publicly accessible areas (including schools and hospitals) are normally <br />thousands of times below international standards. <br />In fact, due to their lower frequency, at similar RF exposure levels, the body <br />absorbs up to five times more of the signal from FM radio and television <br />than from base stations. This is because the frequencies used in FM radio <br />(around 100 MHz) and in TV broadcasting (around 300 to 400 MHz) are <br />lower than those employed in mobile telephony (900 MHz and 1800 MHz) <br />and because a person's height makes the body an efficient receiving <br />antenna. Fuifher, radio and television broadcast stations have been in <br />operation for the past 50 or more years without any adverse health <br />consequence being established. <br />While most radio technologies have used analog signals, modern wireless <br />telecommunications are using digital transmissions. Detailed reviews <br />conducted so far have not revealed any hazard specific to different RF <br />modulations. <br />Cancer: Media or anecdotal reports of cancer clusters around mobile <br />phone base stations have heightened public concern. It should be noted <br />that geographically, cancers are unevenly distributed among any <br />population. Given the widespread presence of base stations in the <br />environment, it is expected that possible cancer clusters will occur near <br />base stations merely by chance. Moreover, the reported cancers in these <br />clusters are often a collection of different types of cancer with no common <br />characteristics and hence unlikely to have a common cause. <br />Scientific evidence on the distribution of cancer in the population can be <br />obtained through carefully planned and executed epidemiological studies. <br />Over the past 15 years, studies examining a potential relationship between <br />RF transmitters and cancer have been published. These studies have not <br />provided evidence that RF exposure from the transmitters increases the <br />risk of cancer. Likewise, long -term animal studies have not established an <br />increased risk of cancer from exposure to RF fields, even at levels that are <br />much higher than produced by base stations and wireless networks. <br />Other effects: Few studies have investigated general health effects in <br />individuals exposed to RF fields from base stations. This is because of the <br />difficulty in distinguishing possible health effects from the very low signals <br />emitted by base stations from other higher strength RF signals in the <br />environment. Most studies have focused on the RF exposures of mobile <br />phone users. Human and animal studies examining brain wave patterns, <br />cognition and behaviour after exposure to RF fields, such as those <br />generated by mobile phones, have not identified adverse effects. RF <br />exposures used in these studies were about 1000 times higher than those <br />associated with general public exposure from base stations or wireless <br />http: / /www. who. int/ mediacentre /factsheets /fs304 /en /index.html 11/17/2011 <br />4 <br />