My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-10-2007 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2007
>
10-10-2007 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/21/2011 2:37:06 PM
Creation date
12/21/2011 2:31:29 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
122
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
G. The business must continue operations of the project for at least five years after the Benefit <br />Date in order to stabilize its occupancy, to establish the project management, and to initiate <br />repayment of the business assistance. If the business is a Qualified Business, that business <br />shall agree to continue to operate in the City for the duration of the Zone. <br />H. The level of business assistance funding should be reduced to the lowest possible level and <br />least amount of time by maximizing the use of private debt and equity financing first, and <br />then using other funding sources or income producing vehicles that can be structured into the <br />project financing, prior to using additional business assistance funding. <br />6. BUSINESS ASSISTANCE PROJECT EVALUATION CRITERIA <br />6.01 All projects will be evaluated by the City Council (the "Council ") on the following criteria for <br />comparison with other proposed business assistance projects reviewed by the City, and for <br />comparison with other subsidy standards (where appropriate). It is realized that changes in local <br />markets, costs of construction, and interest rates may cause changes in the amounts of business <br />assistance subsidies that a given project may require at any given time. <br />6.02 Some criteria, by their very nature, must remain subjective. However, wherever possible <br />"benchmark" criteria have been established for review purposes. The fact that a given proposal <br />meets one or more "benchmark" criteria does not mean that it is entitled to funding under this <br />policy, but rather that the City is in a position to proceed with evaluations of (and comparisons <br />between) various business assistance proposals, using uniform standards whenever possible. <br />6.03 Following are the evaluation criteria that will be used by the City: <br />A. All proposals should, in the opinion of the City Council, optimize the private development <br />potential of a site. <br />B. All proposals should, in the opinion of the City Council, create the highest feasible number of <br />jobs on the site. <br />C. Business assistance will not be provided when the relocating or new business requesting <br />assistance would be in direct competition with an established business in the community. <br />D. All proposals should, in the opinion of the City Council, create the highest possible ratio of <br />property taxes paid before and after redevelopment. Given the different assessment <br />circumstances in the City, this ratio will vary widely. <br />E. Proposals should usually not be used to support speculative industrial, commercial, and office <br />projects. <br />F. Assistance will usually not be used in a project that involves an excessive land and/or <br />property price. <br />G. All business assistance projects will need to meet the "but for" test. Assistance will not be <br />used unless the need for the City's economic participation is sufficient that, without that <br />assistance the project could not proceed in the manner as proposed. <br />H. Business assistance will not be used when the business's credentials, in the sole judgment of <br />the City, are inadequate due to past track record relating to: completion of projects, general <br />91- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.