My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-08-2012 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2012
>
02-08-2012 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/9/2014 1:50:59 PM
Creation date
2/3/2012 4:05:42 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
WHO 1 Electromagnetic fields and public health Page 3 of 4 <br />networks. No consistent evidence of altered sleep or cardiovascular <br />function has been reported. <br />Some individuals have reported that they experience non - specific <br />symptoms upon exposure to RF fields emitted from base stations and other <br />EMF devices. As recognized in a recent WHO fact sheet "Electromagnetic <br />Hypersensitivity", EMF has not been shown to cause such symptoms. <br />Nonetheless, it is important to recognize the plight of people suffering from <br />these symptoms. <br />From all evidence accumulated so far, no adverse short- or long -term <br />health effects have been shown to occur from the RF signals produced by <br />base stations. Since wireless networks produce generally lower RF signals <br />than base stations, no adverse health effects are expected from exposure <br />to them. <br />Protection standards <br />International exposure guidelines have been developed to provide <br />protection against established effects from RF fields by the International <br />Commission on Non - Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP, 1998) and the <br />Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers (IEEE, 2005). <br />National authorities should adopt international standards to protect their <br />citizens against adverse levels of RF fields. They should restrict access to <br />areas where exposure limits may be exceeded. <br />Public perception of risk <br />Some people perceive risks from RF exposure as likely and even possibly <br />severe. Several reasons for public fear include media announcements of <br />new and unconfirmed scientific studies, leading to a feeling of uncertainty <br />and a perception that there may be unknown or undiscovered hazards. <br />Other factors are aesthetic concerns and a feeling of a lack of control or <br />input to the process of determining the location of new base stations. <br />Experience shows that education programmes as well as effective <br />communications and involvement of the public and other stakeholders at <br />appropriate stages of the decision process before installing RF sources can <br />enhance public confidence and acceptability. <br />Conclusions <br />Considering the very low exposure levels and research results collected to <br />date, there is no convincing scientific evidence that the weak RF signals <br />from base stations and wireless networks cause adverse health effects. <br />WHO Initiatives <br />WHO, through the International EMF Project, has established a programme <br />to monitor the EMF scientific literature, to evaluate the health effects from <br />exposure to EMF in the range from 0 to 300 GHz, to provide advice about <br />possible EMF hazards and to identify suitable mitigation measures. <br />http: / /www. who. int/ mediacentre /factsheets /fs304 /en /index.html 11/17/2011 <br />6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.