Laserfiche WebLink
SAINTPAUL J <br />Meter <br />Replacement <br />Project <br />Contact Information <br />Notification Process <br />Reading Your Meter <br />News and Updates <br />Radio Frequency <br />Health and Safely <br />Interference and <br />Ptivaoy <br />FAQ <br />Alternate Metering <br />Systems <br />PSA Video <br />Project update <br />Health and Safety Concerns <br />Safety <br />Power /Electrical Connections <br />• The radio unit is powered by a singled "D' cell battery, wilidl is warranted by the manufacturer to Iast 20 years. <br />• Neither the water meter not the radi0-read transmitter atted10d to the water meter are connected to any electrical syste <br />and 5o they am not affected by any electrical circuitry. <br />Health Concerns <br />Radiation Emitting Electronic Products <br />Governed by the FDA, radiatiomemitting electronic products are pail of our daily lives and have been for decades. <br />Nearly every home or work environment contains not merely ono, but several radiatiomemlliing, electronic products. <br />Our modem culture depends on them for everything from lighting rooms to watching TV and movies to listening to music on CD. <br />Non lonizing, optical, radiation is used In: <br />Halogen lamps <br />Remote controls <br />Digital displays /monitors <br />Fluorescent lamps <br />UPC readers <br />Laser toys and novelties <br />Laser primers <br />Laser pointers <br />Fiber optic communications <br />CD and CD ROM players <br />DUD players <br />Auto locus cameras <br />Namiordztng, radio frequency, electromagnetic frequency, microwave, and magnetic radiation is used In: <br />Cell phones <br />Remote controls <br />Microwave ovens <br />Electric blankets <br />Cblamalaur radios <br />Anti.holdinlrusion alarms <br />Security systems <br />Police radar <br />Video monitors <br />Walkie-talkies <br />Communication <br />FDA Information on Radiation EmlI3 g Products <br />Page 1 of 2 <br />�REGI0)IAR. <br />y(ETg( <br />SWIMS <br />Possible Carcinogen? <br />M June of 2011, the World Health Organization came out with a statement indicating that radiofrequency electromagnetic energy from cell phones is a possible <br />carcinogen (Group 20), based on a study coordinated by the International Agency for Research on Cancer Involving 14,000 people. <br />Other items in this Gass (Group 20) include caffeine and talc.based powders. <br />The WHO's definition of this dassi(Calion is: <br />'A positive association has bean observed between exposure to the agent and cancer for which a <br />causal interpretation Is considered by the Working Group l0 bo credible, but chance, bias, or <br />confounding could not be ruled out with reasonable confidence." <br />In other words, the agent could possibly be cancer csuswng, or the association between exposure to the agent <br />and cancer could just be chance or blas. <br />More recently, Oct. 21, 2011. a much lamer study Involving more than 350,400 people conducted by Danish (Marchers has found no difference In cancer rates <br />between people who had used a cellphone for about a decade, and people who had not. <br />The Star Tribune article makes it clear Inat neither the FDA nor the FCC (have found any evidence to suggest that cellphones are linked 50 cancer. <br />The arlide g005 orl t0 stale Mal. <br />Cellphonos send signals to nearby towers we radio waves, a form of energy similar to microwaves. But the radiation produced by callphonos <br />cannot directly damage DNA and is different from stronger typos of radiation like X -rays or ultraviolet light. At very (high levels, radio frequency <br />waves from coliphones can heat up body tissue, but that is not believed to damage human cells. <br />Supporting those findings, Ibe National Cancer Institute states: <br />Although (here have been some concerns that radiofrequency energy from cell phones held closely 10 the head <br />may afreet the brain and Other tissues, to date them Is no evldana° from studios of cells, animals, or <br />humans that radlofrequoncy energy can cause cantor. <br />II is generally accepted that damage to DNA is necessary for cancer to develop. <br />However, radiofrequency energy. unlike ionizing radiation, does not taus) DNA damage in cells, <br />and it has not been found to cause cancer in animals or to enhance the canconcaustng effects of <br />known chemical Caminogens in animals. <br />National Cancer institute al the National institutes of Health' Report On Cell Phones end Cancer Ries <br />WHO statement on etedromannatic fields and Public Health: Mobile Phones <br />Read Me FDA si010ment on Current Research Results on Cell Phone Use <br />Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity <br />One of the health concerns listed in information being disseminated throughout our service area is electromagnetic <br />hypersensitivity. in some handouts being circulated, it has also been referred to as mtcrowave or radio wave sickness. <br />https: / /www.saintpaulwater.com/ meters /meterHealthSafety.asp 2/3/2012 <br />12 <br />