My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-09-2012 Planning Comm. Agenda
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2012
>
02-09-2012 Planning Comm. Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/6/2012 12:42:03 PM
Creation date
2/6/2012 12:04:16 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
On the attached maps, we show how the buffer applies to the existing zoning pattern in <br />the City. It is important to remember that if the buffer zone catches a small portion of a <br />parcel, the entire parcel is ineligible, so the impact of the buffer is actually more broad <br />that then overlay marking appears on the map. Thus, the larger overall map tends to <br />visually appear to show more land than is actually available. Almost all of the available <br />area is located in the northwest corner of the City, with two additional small parcels <br />along Rice Street between Trunk Highway 36 and Minnesota Street — one occupied by <br />McDonalds and the other owned by the City of Little Canada. <br />There are usually two options to consider. The first is to add adult uses to the B -3 and <br />I -1 Districts, and retain the existing 500 foot buffer. The expanded map referred to <br />above shows the parcels that would be potentially eligible under this scheme, and the <br />percentage of the City available to adult uses would be 4.06% - reasonably close <br />enough to the 5% estimated threshold we commonly aim for. <br />The second option is more difficult to accomplish. Even with no buffer, but exempting <br />parcels that directly abut sensitive uses, the B -2 and PUD Districts provide just 2.82% of <br />the City. Thus, we need to either add a zoning district to this list, or allow adult uses to <br />directly abut the very uses that the ordinance is designed to protect. <br />The best solution appears to be to add the B -3 and 1 -1 Districts to the ordinance, but <br />retain the 500 foot buffer distance. The properties that get added include B -3 zoned <br />parcels along the north portion of Rice Street and the 1 -1 zoned land which has much <br />less impact or exposure. <br />Summary and Recommendation <br />The material presented identifies issues with the City's adult use regulations as they <br />apply to the current zoning pattern. The growth of the use of the PUD district, the <br />separation of the B -2 and B -3 linkage that was in the previous ordinance, and a <br />relatively small change in land use patterns over time has eroded the available area to <br />less than 2% of the City under the current 500 foot buffer. <br />To recover an area for potential adult use location that approaches the traditional 5% <br />threshold, planning staff recommends adding adult uses to the B -3 and 1 -1 zoning <br />districts, but retaining the 500 foot buffer zone. This results in an eligible area for adult <br />uses of more than 4% of the City. <br />Attached to this report are three maps that illustrate the impact of this amendment, <br />including (1) the existing zoning pattern for the entire City with the overlay buffer, (2) the <br />parcels that would eligible in the B -2, B-3,1-1, and PUD zones after the amendment, <br />and a enlarged view of the northwest portion of the city where the vast majority of the <br />eligible parcels are located. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.