Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />DECEMBER 17, 2025 <br />invested over $1,000,000 in capital between the purchase of the property and reinvestment into the <br />building. She explained that they chose the location because the desired use complied with zoning and <br />applicable State law and is obligated to a five-year lease, noting that she relies on her renters within the <br />multi -use space to fulfill that obligation. She had strong reason to believe that the ordinance was <br />targeted towards one of her businesses, Professional Cuddles, and provided additional information on <br />the business. She commented that non -medical touch -based services have not been subject to the <br />newly proposed ordinance, and the draft ordinance came about quickly after her business was cleared <br />to operate in the community. She believed that the City appears to be misclassifying her work and did <br />not believe it was appropriate to enact massage therapy restrictions on other businesses. She likened it <br />to applying massage therapy restrictions to a childcare business simply because the workers physically <br />interact with children. She explained that these restrictions would directly undermine their ability to <br />provide professional services to their wide range of clients, including the elderly, neurodiverse, and <br />disabled, which violates State Statute. She believed that the proposed ordinance and regulation may be <br />in response to a situation that is misunderstood. She stated that the rushed, vague language within the <br />draft ordinance has been causing a lot of confusion and concern within the community, and believed <br />that there are already adequate protections in place, that the ordinance is unnecessary, and questionable <br />as it relates to State Statute. She asked if the City has considered that this ordinance would implicate <br />many other safe, non -healthcare services along with her business, such as churches, daycares, beauty <br />services, spas, gyms, performing arts, and others. She hoped that they could discuss and sort this out <br />together, extending an invitation to those who want to better understand her work, and asked the <br />Council not to adopt the ordinance. <br />Kristin Burich, Healing within Wellness Center, commented that she has been operating for 23 years in <br />Shoreview and was invited by the previous speaker to move her business into that new location. She <br />appreciated the desire of the Council to ensure that people are safe and protected. She commented that <br />they would want to have a safe and protected space for their customers, which is why she is partnering <br />with Ms. Mertin. She stated that they want to create safety and protection without limiting the <br />opportunity to heal. She explained some of the therapies they use to assist people with healing. She <br />commented that her customers feel safe and protected in her business, and they chose Little Canada <br />because of the sense of community that exists. <br />Timothy, a St. Paul resident, commented that he does not understand everything about the ordinance <br />but wanted to provide input as a customer of Professional Cuddles. He noted the ground rules that <br />were set at his first session and explained how cuddle therapy has helped him to become more self- <br />confident, more open to people, and assisted him in building new relationships with others. He had <br />concerns that this ordinance would hamper the ability of the business to provide services to its clients. <br />He stated that they need to have a comfortable space for the therapy and, therefore, had concerns with <br />the proposed furniture restrictions. He commented that professional cuddling has greatly benefited <br />him, and he wished he discovered it sooner in life. <br />Mark Ohnstead, an attorney representing Ms. Mertins, stated that this ordinance raises legal issues that <br />should be more thoroughly considered. He stated that ordinances cannot affect vested rights, noting <br />the investment of over $1,000,000 into the building by Ms. Mertins, along with the five-year lease that <br />she signed for the space prior to the thought of this ordinance existing. He stated that the business <br />received a certificate of occupancy and was in full compliance with all zoning and City regulations. <br />on <br />