Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />FEBRUARY 8, 2012 <br />The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by McGraw. <br />Ayes (5). <br />Nays (0). Resolution declared adopted. <br />REVIEW OF The Public Work Superintendent reviewed his February 3, 2012 <br />ALTERNATE report relative to the City's Alternate Water Meter Systems Policy <br />WATER that was developed for those property owners who chose not to have a <br />METER fixed - network radio in their homes. 'This policy allows residents to <br />SYSTEMS choose to either have the radio mounted on the outside of their homes <br />POLICY at no additional charge or the City can put in a touchpad on the home and <br />continue reading the meter manually for a $12 per quarter charge. This <br />policy allows alternatives to those residents who have a concern that there <br />is a health risk with the radio waves transmitted by the new system. <br />The Superintendent reported that to date 2,160 of the new meters have <br />been installed and there are about 150 left to be installed. The City has <br />three official opt -outs and a request from another homeowner who wishes <br />to opt out, but doesn't want to pay the quarterly charge. <br />The Superintendent reported that many studies have been commissioned <br />on the effects of radio frequencies (microwaves, telephones, wireless <br />networks, etc.) on humans, and those studies have all shown no direct <br />links between radio waves and human health effects. The City of St. Paul <br />also did extensive research on this matter, and the Superintendent pointed <br />out that information is included with his report. <br />The Superintendent informed the Council that the new meter reading <br />system transmits 4 times per day for a total of approximately 1 second per <br />day. He pointed out that a wireless network is transmitting at all times. <br />He also pointed out the high use of cell phones. <br />The Superintendent reported that this new meter reading system was put in <br />place to improve efficiency and provide better customer service. The City <br />is not profiting from this system. Blesener agreed that the new system is <br />an attempt to save the utility customers money. The Superintendent <br />reported that based on the research, City staff does not believe the system <br />is a health risk. I-le also felt that a $12 per quarter charge to opt out of the <br />system was fair, pointing out that an employee would have to drive to the <br />home and do a manual read. <br />The Council discussed the radio wave exposure from the automated meter <br />reading system versus cell phone usage. The Administrator also pointed <br />out that the National Cancer Society, World Health Organization, and <br />14 <br />