Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />FEBRUARY 8, 2012 <br />has completed their review of the bid and would recommend approval of <br />the contract. Staff recommends approval of the Infratech bid subject to <br />receipt of Met Council's approval for award. <br />Ms. Boss introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION NO. 2012 -2 -30— AWARDING THE BID OF <br />INFRATECH, INCLUDING ALTERNATIVE #1, IN AN AMOUNT <br />NOT TO EXCEED $404,749 FOR INTERCEPTOR 1 -LC -420 JOINT <br />REPAIR PROJECT SUBJECT TO CONFIRMATION OF THE <br />METROPOLITAN COUNCIL'S APPROVAL FOR AWARD <br />The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by McGraw. <br />Ayes (5). <br />Nays (0). Resolution declared adopted. <br />GOAL The City Administrator reviewed the results of Monday evenings Goal <br />SETTING Setting Session, noting that there were two goals with definite consensus <br />REPORT and several goals over which votes were spread fairly evenly. The <br />Administrator stated that using the criteria of having received at least 3 <br />voted from Council Members and votes from at least 50% of non- elected <br />participants (at least 7 votes out of 14) and 10% of non - elected total points <br />(21 pts.), the following three goals would move forward for 2012 and <br />beyond. These goals are as follows: <br />o Evaluate "spot- zoned" properties, i.e. Norm's, Brings, <br />Arcade Electric, etc.; <br />o Northeast Residential Redevelopment Project; <br />o Evaluate Traffic Safety Improvements. <br />The Administrator indicated that the Council will have to decide if they <br />agree with the criteria to be used to determine goal status. He also noted <br />that at the Goal Setting Session there were several "carry forward" goals <br />that will be added to the list. He further indicated that if an item made the <br />list, even if it is not allocated 2012 Goal status that does not mean that the <br />item will not be worked on and moved forward. <br />Montour noted that there were several goal suggestions relative to trails <br />and parks, and suggested that the Park Commission review these matters <br />and make recommendations. For example, the suggestion to reprioritize <br />trail construction segments can be done by the Commission with a <br />recommendation made to the Council. The City Administrator reported <br />that prioritized trail improvements could be included as part of the capital <br />budget process. He noted that trail segments such as the Troutbrook "frail <br />8 <br />