08-23-2006 Council Agenda - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION AUGUST 10, 2006 Duray noted that the look of the area will remain the same; it is only the lot line that is being moved. Duray asked if all code requirements are being met. The City Planner reported that the lot division /combination meets all City Code requirements. The Planner noted his recommendation for vacation of drainage and utility easements on the current lot line and replacing those easements on the new lot line. David Finkelson stated that he understood and agreed to the vacation and dedication of new easements. McGraw recommended approval of the Property Division /Combination dividing 25 feet from 2612 Spruce Street and combining it with 2620 Spruce Street as requested by Norman, David, and Samantha Finkelson subject to compliance with the recommendations of the City Planner as outlined in his report dated August 4, 2006. Motion seconded by Socha. Motion carried 6 — 0. AMENDMENT Mr. David Evans, 182 Ryan Lane, appeared before the Commission TO CUP — requesting approval of an Amendment to the Conditional Use Permit for 182 RYAN 182 Ryan Lane for open and outdoor storage as an accessory use. Evans LANE — reported that due to a drainage issue with his parking lot, he did not install DAVID EVANS the curbing that was a requirement of his existing CUP. He noted that the installation of this curbing would prevent his parking lot from draining properly. Therefore, he has submitted a new site plan relative to the CUP without the curbing and showing the required 11 parking spaces. Evans noted that the City Planner has identified that parking spaces #6 and #7 are too close to the property line and must be moved. Evans felt that he could reconfigure the site plan to move the parking spaces as recommended by the City Planner. The City Planner noted that the City Engineer's report was drafted after the planning report, and noted that there are a couple of items in conflict between the two reports. The City Engineer has noted that given the drainage problems on this property, curbing would prevent the parking lot from draining. The City Planner indicated that based on the City Engineer's report he is amending his recommendation to allow for the wider curb cut. However, parking spaces #6 and #7 would still have to be relocated at least five feet back from the curb line. Duray asked if Evans could relocate the two parking spaces. Evans felt he had options on the property to relocate those parking spaces. He 2