My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-27-2006 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
09-27-2006 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/22/2014 3:17:09 PM
Creation date
3/19/2012 1:43:01 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
178
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
No Seatbelt $103 $40 <br />Child Restraint $103 $40 <br />Expired Tabs /Plates $ 98 $40 <br />Tab Missing /Plates $ 98 $40 <br />Parking Violations varies $25 <br />Some of the benefits other cities have claimed as the result of an administrative offense <br />ordinance include: <br />• A more streamlined process for minor traffic violations. <br />• Administrative penalties are lower than those imposed by the court systems and there <br />is no impact to a violator's traffic record. <br />• All penalty revenue would be retained by the City <br />• Lessen impact of minor traffic violations on the court system. (In our case, this may <br />not be true as the offenses we are considering have not been cited to any great degree <br />in the past. <br />• Reduces Sheriff's deputies "court time" requirements which often take deputies off <br />the streets. <br />• Provides greater latitude to an officer to address problems areas (i.e. speeding that is <br />less than 10 miles per hour over the limit). <br />It should be noted that the Attorney General and the State Auditor have raised concerns <br />about the use of administrative citations, particularly as they relate to traffic violations <br />covered in state statute. As noted in the attached letters from the Attorney General's <br />Office and State Auditor's Office, they conclude that cities do not have the authority to <br />impose administrative penalties on traffic violations covered by State law. Cities have <br />more latitude with administrative penalties for local regulations such as alcohol and <br />tobacco compliance checks, nuisance code violations, and overnight parking restrictions. <br />(By copy of this memo, staff is asking the City Attorney to review this information and <br />to comment on this issue.) <br />Despite the concerns of the Attorney General's office and State Auditor's office dating <br />back to the 2003 letters, the legislature has not adopted any rules pertaining to <br />administrative offense ordinances. Some cities are continuing to use administrative <br />citations even for minor traffic violations. However, a number of cities have stopped <br />using administrative citations for traffic violations covered by State statute. (That is why <br />we have limited its usage to those areas where citations were not readily issued in the <br />past.) <br />Staff is seeking feedback from the Council regarding the possible use of administrative <br />citations for limited traffic violations. The other contract cities are also discussing this <br />with their city councils to hopefully reach a consensus on whether to move forward with <br />an ad; iinistrative 0' :L nse ordinance. <br />-2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.