Laserfiche WebLink
5 Year Retro Assessment: Little Canada {losses as of 2/29/12) <br />Policy Year <br />Regular <br />Premium <br />Option <br />II rZ /,S'7 <br />Retro <br />Option 1 <br />f$.37./fat 7 <br />Retro <br />Option 11 <br />651 n/ <br />ism? <br />Retro <br />Option 111 <br />4/1/07 -08* <br />$27,824 <br />$21,607 <br />$20,942 <br />$19,583 <br />4/1/08 -09* <br />$27,824 <br />$22,560 <br />$21,895 <br />$20,536 <br />4/1/09 -10* <br />$27,824 <br />$21,607 <br />$20,942 <br />$19,583 <br />4/1/10 -11* <br />$27,824 <br />$34,753 <br />$37,775 <br />$45,330 <br />4/1/11 -12 <br />$27,824 <br />$22,252 <br />$21,587 <br />$20,228 <br />total $139,120 $122,779 $123,141 $125,260 <br />italics /underlined= would have reached maximum premium <br />shaded = option that was selected <br />* = The city was not eligible for a retro plan in years incepting 4/1/07• <br />4/1/10, as the standard premium was below the $25,000 threshold. <br />For the purposes of this display, we've dummied in the 4/1/11 -12 <br />regular premium option framework, but used the actual losses for <br />those years. <br />6 <br />