My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-28-2012 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
06-28-2012 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/28/2012 2:57:16 PM
Creation date
3/28/2012 2:44:49 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
219
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
LMC <br />League of Minnesota Cities <br />Cities promoting excet[anco <br />League of Minnesota Cities <br />Insurance Trust <br />145 University Avenue West, St. Paul, MN 55103 -2044 <br />(651) 281 -1200 • (800) 925 -1122 <br />Fax: (651) 281 -1298 • TDD: (651) 281 -1290 <br />www.lmnc.org <br />Joint powers agreements — an outline of risk considerations <br />Cities are always looking for more effective and efficient ways to provide services to citizens. <br />There's increasing political and financial pressure to reduce spending and taxes and at the same <br />time to maintain and increase services. Intergovernmental cooperation can be an effective <br />strategy to accomplish this, but it has to be done right. If it isn't, the result can be conflict among <br />the parties and complicated, contentious, and expensive litigation. Here's an outline of some key <br />considerations that can help avoid some of those problems. <br />1. What kind of intergovernmental cooperative arrangement are we creating? <br />Intergovernmental cooperation can take different forms. It's important to be clear what form <br />of cooperation you intend. The most common types of cooperative arrangements are: <br />• Joint powers entity. The joint operation is governed by a joint board, which has the <br />power to receive and expend funds, enter contracts, etc. <br />• Service contract. One governmental unit purchases a service from another. <br />• Mutual aid. Two or more governmental units agree to assist each other when needed. <br />• Shared resources. Two or more governmental units share the use of facilities. <br />2. Important considerations for any intergovernmental cooperative arrangement. <br />• Put it in writing. In any intergovernmental cooperation situation, there should be a <br />written agreement spelling out what the understanding and agreement is. <br />• Be clear and unambiguous as to who is responsible for what. <br />• Address how the arrangement would be terminated and how assets or liabilities would be <br />allocated. <br />• Address risk allocation. The goal in each case is to minimize costs by minimizing <br />conflicts and litigation among parties and allowing for a common defense. But how you <br />do it varies for different types of agreements. <br />3. Recommendations for how to address risks in different types of joint powers <br />agreements. <br />Risk provisions for agreements creating a joint powers entity. <br />• Joint entity indemnifies the member governmental units for liability claims. <br />• Joint entity carries liability coverage that protects the joint entity, the member <br />governmental units, and their respective officers, employees, and volunteers. <br />• Address how the cost of any uninsured or excess liability would be allocated; e.g. equal <br />shares, or in the same proportion as other costs are shared. <br />-17- <br />AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY /AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.