Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />PLANNING COMMISSION <br />JANUARY 12, 2006 <br />entrance to the back room area would be posted restricting access to people <br />aged 21 years and older. <br />Knudsen asked if someone would ID patrons going into the back room. <br />Meyer replied that there would be. She indicated that they are considering <br />purchasing an electronic machine that validates age. Knudsen asked if there <br />would be a person posted at the door ensuring that no one under 21 years of <br />age enters. Meyer reported that there would be. <br />Rheaume asked if patrons would be prevented from taking beer out of the <br />back room. Meyer replied that sales and consumption would be restricted <br />to the back room. <br />Knudsen pointed out that there was a 6 -month review for the Alriffi CUP, <br />and suggested that the same review period be utilized for the Meyers. <br />Knudsen felt that would be prudent given the 4 a.m. closing time as well as <br />the 3.2 Intoxicating Malt Liquor License. <br />Barraclough recommended approval of the Conditional Use Permit to allow <br />billiard /amusement hall as a commercial recreation use in the PUD District <br />subject to the following: <br />o 4 a.m. closing time to be allowed, with closing time to be <br />posted as 2 a.m.; <br />o Alcohol sales and consumption to be restricted to the back <br />room area and sales to cease at 1 a.m.; <br />o The CUP is non - transferable; <br />o A satisfactory six -month review of the CUP. <br />Motion seconded by McGraw. <br />Motion carried 7 — 0. <br />TEXT The City Planner reported that the Shoreland District is an overlay district <br />AMENDMENT to properties within 1,000 feet of a lake. Properties within the Shoreland <br />FOR R -1 District are subject to a 50 foot front yard setback, while the front yard <br />FRONT YARD setback for the Single - Family (R -1) District is 30 feet. The City Planner <br />SETBACK was unsure of the reason for the difference in front yard setback, but <br />IN speculated that it could be a means of regulating the amount of lot <br />SHORELAND coverage that can occur. The Planner noted the provision within the <br />DISTRICT Shoreland District that limits lot coverage to a maximum of 30% <br />impervious surface. Therefore, the appropriate protection is in place under <br />this provision. <br />Barraclough noted that the increased front yard setback in the Shoreland <br />District actually pushes development closer toward a lake. Knudsen agreed <br />-3- <br />